By Anna Barnes, Michigan Public

The Great Lakes News Collaborative includes Bridge Michigan; Circle of Blue; Great Lakes Now at Detroit PBS; Michigan Public, Michigan’s NPR News Leader; and The Narwhal who work together to bring audiences news and information about the impact of climate change, pollution, and aging infrastructure on the Great Lakes and drinking water. This independent journalism is supported by the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation. Find all the work HERE.


Michigan’s Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Division received one-time funding of $350,000 for whitefish recovery from the state budget. The ailing species has undergone a rapid population decline in recent years, and for the first time, recovery efforts have a specific line in the state budget.

But officials said while the funding will help rescue some of the most vulnerable lake whitefish populations, it’s not enough to address the systemic ecosystem issues causing the decline.

Randy Claramunt, the state’s fisheries chief, said whitefish have struggled against several different invasive species introductions through the years.

“Populations were very strong until the 50’s and 60’s but when the sea lamprey invasion really hit hard, most populations declined,” he said. “They rebounded up until the time when the next big invasive introduction happened in the Great Lakes.”

Now, invasive zebra and quagga mussels have caused another decline in the population, but this time it’s a crisis, Claramunt said. He said the one-time funding shows legislators recognize the importance of the whitefish.

“It was driven by concerned lawmakers that recognized the problem and wanted to see some action,” he said.

But the funding is limited, and Claramunt said there are at least a dozen vulnerable whitefish stocks across the Great Lakes, many of which will not receive help this time around because others are even more sensitive.

“It’s a drop in the bucket when you look at the scale of the problem,” he said.

Nichole Keway Biber of the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians works for Clean Water Action. She said whitefish are a culturally important species to the Anishinaabe tribes in Michigan.

Oral histories of the Anishinaabe and whitefish tell of a deep relationship, Biber said: “At a time of starvation, they decided to sacrifice themselves with the agreement that we’d survive as long as we make sure that they did.”

She said human activities and invasive species have damaged the natural systems that kept whitefish alive until now and while the funding is necessary, the systemic causes of population decline needs to be funded and addressed.

“I think of it as kind of like seed saving,” she said. “Doing what we can to have enough whitefish to survive as we look toward the time where necessarily we’ll be collectively putting our focus on how the ecosystems become restored.”

Keway Biber said the one-time funding is also coming at a time when human activities are threatening the whitefish’s ability to re-populate. She said a project to move an oil and natural gas pipeline from the lakebed on the bottom of the Straits of Mackinac, to a tunnel under the straits, would strain the population.

Permits for the project were issued this week by state agencies, although it still needs further approvals to start construction.

“The tunnel project would put massive amounts of wastewater into the Great Lakes, right into the sensitive ecosystems where whitefish are already struggling and on the brink of collapse,” Keway Biber said.

The decline of whitefish in Michigan is largely attributed to rising populations of invasive mussels.

Claramunt said there is a bill proposed int the state Legislature that would supply the Great Lakes Fishery Commission with $500 million dollars over 10 years to combat the invasive mussels, but he is not counting on it passing any time soon.

Dan O’Keefe, Michigan Sea Grant southwest district extension educator, said research on mussel populations in western Lake Erie has shown a decrease in the species. This is likely due to predation by freshwater drum fish in the region.

The freshwater drum have crushing teeth in the back of their throat which makes eating shelled prey, like the invasive mussels, comparatively easy for them, he said.

There are other native fish in the Great Lakes that can eat mussels, but either their populations are too low to make a difference or the caloric benefit is not sustainable for them, O’Keefe said. (The shell gets in the way, he said.)

The freshwater drum can eat enough of the mussels to sustain itself and the biomass of mussels in western Lake Erie has decreased with populations on a downward trajectory, said O’Keefe. However, the freshwater drum only lives in shallow areas of the Great Lakes, limiting their ability to clear mussels.

Quagga mussels can live in deep water and have spread further into the Great Lakes where fish like the drum will not go.

Sturgeon also eat mussels and in certain cases, they can make up a significant amount of their diet, he said, but sturgeon prefer most other prey to the mussels. Their population is also not large enough to have a great impact on the mussel population.

Ashley Elgin, a research ecologist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said mussel control is not possible in the Great Lakes region right now but agencies are focusing on the targeted removal in high value locations.

One strategy, pioneered by the Great Lakes Spawning Whitefish and Invasive Mussels Project, is to infuse carbon dioxide underneath a heavy mat on the lake bottom to smother the mussels, she said.

“We’re also looking at the use of underwater vehicles to be moving custom-designed implements on the bottom that are designed to remove mussels from the sediment and destroy them,” Elgin said.

Elgin said while native fish predation on mussels may not be a complete solution, it should be encouraged.

“If you can take advantage of natural native populations as being part of the control strategy, that makes a lot of sense and we could make it more effective,” she said.

The post Michigan fisheries get one-time funding for whitefish restoration appeared first on Great Lakes Now.

Original Article

Great Lakes Now

Great Lakes Now

https://www.greatlakesnow.org/2026/07/23/michigan-fisheries-get-one-time-funding-for-whitefish-restoration/

Michigan Public

By Kelly House, Bridge Michigan

The Great Lakes News Collaborative includes Bridge Michigan; Circle of Blue; Great Lakes Now at Detroit Public Television; and Michigan Radio, Michigan’s NPR News Leader; who work together to bring audiences news and information about the impact of climate change, pollution, and aging infrastructure on the Great Lakes and drinking water. This independent journalism is supported by the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation. Find all the work HERE.


With Great Lakes whitefish in steep decline, should Michigan cast a lifeline to commercial fishers and allow them to catch other species?

That was the subject of debate Wednesday, as the state House Natural Resources and Tourism Committee took up a pair of bills that would overhaul the state’s commercial fishing regulations.

The biggest change would open access lake trout and walleye that are currently off-limits to most state-licensed commercial fishers.

Lake whitefish are the livelihood of Michigan’s struggling commercial industry, and they’re vanishing because invasive mussels siphon their main food source. Catches have plunged 70% since 2009.

“If something’s not done, we’re all going to go away in the next five or 10 years,” said Dana Serafin, a commercial fisherman out of Pinconning.

The proposition faces opposition from recreational fishers who vastly outnumber commercial ones: There are 1.2 million recreational fishing licenses in Michigan, with a collective economic impact of about $4 billion, while the state’s commercial fleet has dwindled to just a handful of boats bringing in a few million-dollars’ worth of fish.

In a letter, the Michigan Anglers Consortium contended commercial fishing would “introduce industrial-scale harvest pressure on species whose populations remain fragile.”

The Department of Natural Resources also opposes the bills, predicting they would invite lawsuits and increase tensions.

“These attempts at (a) wholesale rewrite of the entire commercial fishing statute (are) accomplishing one thing,” said Randy Claramount, the state’s fisheries chief. “It’s deepening the divide between recreational and commercial fishers.”

Both sides agree regulations are outdated. Many were written decades ago, when overfishing and invasive lamprey were the top concerns and the mussel crisis had not yet begun.

“Temporary rules became permanent policy while the lakes changed, the science changed, the economy changed,” said Rep. Jason Morgan, D-Ann Arbor, a chief sponsor of the legislation.

Fishing access in the Great Lakes is controlled by a web of state law, policy and court settlements that divide access between recreational anglers, tribal anglers and state-regulated commercial fishers.

For the most part, commercial operations get the whitefish, recreational ones get the salmon and tribes and recreational anglers share the lake trout.

Lawmakers appeared divided on the legislation, with some criticizing the DNR’s current management tactics and others expressing concern about how the bills would affect the agency’s budget.

Rep. David Preston, R-Cedar River and a cosponsor of the legislation, described the hearing as the start of a prolonged conversation about the future of fisheries. 

“We’re going to solve this,” Prestin said, adding that “I’ve got a room full of people that love fish, and we’re talking about fishing.”


The post Whitefish waning. Should Michigan have commercial trout, walleye catches? appeared first on Great Lakes Now.

Original Article

Great Lakes Now

Great Lakes Now

https://www.greatlakesnow.org/2026/05/27/whitefish-waning-should-michigan-have-commercial-trout-walleye-catches/

Bridge Michigan

As lake whitefish teeter on the brink of collapse in the lower Great Lakes, Michigan lawmakers are considering investing in a last-ditch effort to save the iconic species before it’s too late.

An appropriations bill under consideration in the Democrat-controlled state Senate would allocate money to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for a rearing and stocking program aimed at “supporting lake whitefish stock recovery.”

The line item includes a $100 allocation, which state Sen. John Cherry, D-Flint, described as a placeholder number pending further deliberations about how much money — if any — to devote to the effort.

“It could potentially be now or never for some of those genetic stocks,” Cherry said, noting that some whitefish bloodlines in lakes Michigan and Huron could vanish within years.

Budget deliberations are in their early phases and proposals from Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and the Republican-led House of Representatives do not include funding for whitefish.

State Reps. Ken Borton and Ann Bollin, who lead committees overseeing the DNR budget in the House, did not return calls from Bridge Michigan seeking comment.

The House approved a $76 billion budget last week that would cut DNR funding by $36.3 million. Whitmer’s budget proposal would increase DNR funding by $63.5 million.

The Senate could pass its version as soon as this week, setting up further negotiations as the two chambers face a September deadline to pass a unified budget.

The funding effort follows extensive reporting on the whitefish collapse in Bridge Michigan over the past year. 

“Quite frankly, your guys’s reporting was helpful in highlighting the issue,” Cherry told Bridge. “Otherwise, I think a lot of folks wouldn’t be aware of it.”

The fish are a revered symbol of the Great Lakes and the No. 1 commercial catch for what remains of the region’s once-robust commercial fishery.

Ecosystem changes wrought by invasive quagga and zebra mussels have transformed the Great Lakes, devastating whitefish populations and prompting fears that the species could virtually disappear from lakes Michigan and Huron. 

The mussel invasion is considered among the biggest threats to the Great Lakes in history. 

Yet Bridge found that, while the US government has spent mightily to combat other threats, the fight against mussels has received a comparative pittance: less than $1 million annually, or about a penny for every dollar devoted to guarding the Great Lakes against invasive carp.

In the wake of that reporting, US Reps. Debbie Dingell and Tim Walberg cosponsored legislation that aims to devote $500 million to mussel control research over the next decade.

State funding for whitefish recovery is likewise limited amid budget constraints and a DNR funding structure that prioritizes game species like salmon and trout ahead of primarily commercial species like whitefish.

At current funding levels, mussel control research may take decades to achieve a breakthrough. The lower lakes’ whitefish “don’t have the time to wait,” said DNR fisheries chief Randy Claramunt.

So tribal, state, federal and university officials have been discussing ways to raise whitefish in captivity until the Great Lakes are hospitable enough for them to thrive again. 

The effort likely would involve both a hatchery stocking program and an effort to establish captive whitefish populations for future breeding efforts.

“Who has facility space? Who can do something if funding is available? What could we do without having to build a new facility?” Claramunt said. “That’s what we’re all looking at right now as a stopgap measure to buy us time before we lose some of these stocks.”

There are 18 genetically distinct whitefish populations in lakes Michigan and Huron, 14 of which are considered imperiled. 

“The other four that were considered stable are now at risk of declining,” Claramunt said. 

That includes stocks in Green Bay, which was once considered a rare stronghold for Great Lakes whitefish.

So far, most recovery efforts have been small-scale, led by tribal natural resources agencies with limited budgets and staff. But as stocks have dwindled, whitefish advocates have increasingly pushed for bigger, bolder rescue efforts.

For each population rescued, Claramunt said, it would cost between $200,000 and $300,000 annually to collect spawning fish from the lakes, raise their offspring for stocking efforts, and hold some adults in captivity for future breeding.

The DNR may have space in its hatchery facilities to rescue up to three populations, Claramunt said. It’s possible other tribal, government or university agencies could lend more space.

“We’re concerned that a genetic rescue is necessary, and if we don’t do it as soon as possible … that these stocks will be lost,” Claramunt said.

Michigan has a long history of rescuing species under threat, Cherry said, from wild turkeys to moose. It has also had failures, such allowing the passenger pigeon to be hunted to extinction.

“We have an opportunity right now to figure out which direction we want to go,” Cherry said. “The direction of the passenger pigeon, or do we want to go the direction of the turkey?”

The post Michigan lawmakers may fund last-ditch effort to save whitefish appeared first on Great Lakes Now.

Original Article

Great Lakes Now

Great Lakes Now

https://www.greatlakesnow.org/2026/05/05/michigan-lawmakers-may-fund-last-ditch-effort-to-save-whitefish/

Kelly House, Bridge Michigan

STURGEON BAY, WISCONSIN — It’s midmorning in late February, and Bruce Smith is regaling two ice fishing buddies when a tug on his line interrupts the story.

“There we go!” he shouts as a shimmering 23-inch whitefish appears through a hole in the ice. “That’ll make a nice filet.”

No sooner has Smith tossed it into a cooler than his buddy Terry Gross reels in another one. Five minutes later came another bite, then another, until by 10:30 a.m. the trio had hauled in 15 fish — halfway to their daily limit, even after putting several back. 

Welcome to southern Green Bay. Or as Smith likes to call it, “Whitefish Town, USA.”

Once written off as too polluted to support many whitefish, the shallow, narrow bay in northwest Lake Michigan has produced an unlikely population boom in recent years, even as the iconic species vanishes from most of the lower Great Lakes. The collapse has dealt a blow to Michigan’s environmentcultureeconomy and dinner plates.

Oddly enough, nutrient pollution from farms and factories may help bolster the bay’swhitefish population, spawning a world-class recreational fishing scene while helping a handful of commercial fisheries in Michigan and Wisconsin stay afloat despite the collapse in the wider lake.

“This is a paradise,” Smith said. “The best fishing I can ever remember, for the species I want to catch.”

Terry Gross, 63, hauls in a large whitefish in the ice fishing shanty he shares with Ed Smrecek, 73. Both men are from Appleton, Wisconsin. (Daniel Kramer for Bridge Michigan)

As scientists work to understand what makes Green Bay unique, their findings could aid whitefish recovery efforts throughout the Great Lakes. Michigan biologists, for example, have drawn inspiration from Green Bay’s sheltered, nutrient-rich waters as they attempt to transplant the state’s whitefish into areas with similar characteristics.

“Having places they (whitefish) are doing well … gives us context for the places that they aren’t doing well,” said Matt Herbert, a senior conservation scientist with the Nature Conservancy in Michigan. “It helps us to figure out, how can we intervene?”

But lately, sophisticated population models have shown fewer baby fish making their way into the Green Bay population, prompting worries that Lake Michigan’s last whitefish stronghold may be weakening.

A Great Lakes miracle

Not long ago, it seemed impossible that a fishery like this could ever exist in Green Bay.

Before the Clean Water Act of 1972 and subsequent cleanup efforts, paper mills along the lower Fox River — the bay’s largest tributary — dumped toxic polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) into the water without restraint while silty, fertilizer-soaked runoff poured off upstream farms.

Southern Green Bay was no place for “a self-respecting whitefish,” said Scott Hansen, senior fisheries biologist with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

Lake Michigan’s much larger main basin, meanwhile, was full of them. 

Commercial fisherman Todd Stuth’s business got 80% of its catch from the open waters of Lake Michigan before the turn of the millenium. Now, 90% comes from Green Bay.

How did things change so dramatically?

Invasive mussel shells are more common than pebbles on a Lake Michigan beach near Petoskey.  (Kelly House/Bridge Michigan)

First, invasive filter-feeding zebra and quagga mussels arrived in the Great Lakes from Eastern Europe and multiplied over decades, eventually monopolizing the nutrients and plankton that fish need to survive. Whitefish populations in lakes Michigan and Huron have tanked as a result.

Fortunately for Wisconsin and a sliver of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, Hansen said, “Southern Green Bay kept building.”

In the late 1990s, scientists began spotting the fish in Green Bay area rivers where they hadn’t been seen in a century. Soon the species started showing up during surveys of lower Green Bay. By the early 2010s, models show the bay was teeming with tens of millions of them.

It’s not entirely clear what caused the whitefish revival, but most see cleaner water as part of the equation.

A decades-long restoration project has cleared away more than 6 million yards of sediment laced with PBCs and nutrient-laced farm runoff from the Fox River and lower Green Bay. Phosphorus concentrations near the rivermouth have declined by a third over 40 years — though they’re still considered too high.

“Pelicans are back, and the bird population seems to be thriving,” said Sarah Bartlett, a water resources specialist with the Green Bay Metropolitan Sewerage District, which monitors the bay’s water quality. “And now we have this world-class fishery.”

Hansen’s theory is that back when whitefish were still abundant in Lake Michigan, some wanderers strayed into the newly hospitable bay and decided to stay. Or maybe they were here all along, waiting for the right conditions to multiply.

Either way, the bay has become a lifeline for whitefish and the humans that eat them.

“I feel very fortunate that the bay is doing as well as it is,” said Stuth, who chairs the state commercial fishing board. 

As commercial harvests in the Wisconsin waters of Lake Michigan plummeted from more than 1.6 million pounds in 2000 to less than 200,000 pounds in 2024, harvests in Green Bay skyrocketed from less than 100,000 pounds to more than 800,000.

The bay has also become more important to fishers in Michigan, which has jurisdiction over a portion of its waters.

While the state’s total commercial harvests from Lake Michigan have plummeted 70% since 2009 to just 1.2 million pounds annually, the decline would be steeper were it not for stable stocks in the bay. Once accounting for just a sliver of the catch, the bay now makes up more than half.

Vytautas Majus, who lives in Chicago, left the city at 2 a.m. to be on the ice fishing for whitefish by 7 a.m. Behind him, the horizon is dotted with ice shanties and anglers also hoping to land a whitefish. (Daniel Kramer for Bridge Michigan)

A recreational ice fishing scene has sprung up too, with thousands of anglers taking to the ice each winter, contributing tens of millions to the local economy.

Ironically, the bay’s lingering nutrient pollution may be helping to some extent – a dynamic also seen in Michigan’s Saginaw Bay. 

Nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen are the building blocks of life, fueling the growth of aquatic plants and algae at the base of the food web. Plankton eat the algae, small fish eat the plankton, and big fish eat the small fish.

Unlike the main basins, where mussels have hogged nutrients and starved out whitefish, polluted runoff leaves the shallow bays with more than enough for the mussels and everything else. 

Some have even suggested Michigan and its neighbors should start fertilizing the big lakes in hopes of giving whitefish a boost, Herbert said, but “there’s the question of feasibility.” 

First, because the lakes are far deeper and wider than the bays, it would take vast quantities to make an impact. And while excess nutrients may help feed fish, they could also cause oxygen-deprived dead zonesharmful algae blooms and other serious problems.

Green Bay is already offering other lessons for Michigan, though. 

Inspired by whitefish’s return to the bay’s rivers, biologists including Herbert are trying to coax Michigan whitefish to spawn in rivers that connect to nutrient-rich rivermouths like Lake Charlevoix. 

The hope is that if hatchlings can spend a few months fattening up before migrating into the mussel-infested big lake, they’ll stand a better chance of surviving.

Scientists in Green Bay are also tracking whitefish movements, hoping to figure out where they spawn and what makes those habitats special. That kind of information could prove useful to recovery efforts throughout the Great Lakes, said Dan Isermann, a fish biologist with the US Geological Survey.

Living in ‘the good old days’

“We’re really lucky to have what we have here,” said JJ Malvitz, a commercial fishing guide who owes his career to Green Bay’s whitefish resurgence. 

But he lives with fear that “the good old days are now.”

(Courtesy of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources)

Stocks have shrunk by half since the mid-2010s, according to population models fed with data from DNR surveys and commercial and recreational harvests. The adult whitefish seem to be fat and healthy. But for reasons unknown, fewer of their offspring have been making it to adulthood.  

It’s possible the bay’s population is just leveling off after a period of strong recruitment, Hansen said, “but we want to be vigilant.”

A recent string of lackluster winters adds to the concern. Whitefish lay their eggs on ice-covered reefs. When that protective layer fails to form or melts off early, the eggs can be battered by waves or enticed to hatch early, out of sync with the spring plankton bloom that serves as their main food source.

As whitefish disappeared from the main basin of Lake Michigan, they experienced a resurgence in Green Bay that still isn’t fully understood. (Courtesy of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources)

While this winter was icier than most, climate change is making low-ice winters more frequent.

“Whitefish are a cold-water species, and we know that’s not where the trends are going,” Hansen said.

Time to cut back?

So far, Wisconsin officials haven’t lowered Green Bay’s annual whitefish quota of 2.28 million pounds, evenly split between the commercial and sport fisheries. Commercial boats are limited to fish bigger than 17 inches, while recreational anglers are limited to 10 fish a day of any size.

But during a recent presentation to the state’s Natural Resources Board, Hansen said it’s time to start keeping closer tabs on the population. 

“If these trends continue,” he said, “We need to have some more serious discussions amongst ourselves about lowering the exploitation rates.”

Malvitz, the guide, believes it’s time for commercial and recreational anglers to collectively agree to harvest fewer fish. He would be satisfied with a five-fish limit for recreational anglers along with smaller quotas for the commercial fishery, which harvests far more fish. 

The bay’s whitefish reappeared quickly and unexpectedly, he said. Who’s to say they couldn’t disappear just as fast?

“I don’t want to be standing on the shore in five years saying ‘remember when,’” he said. 

Stuth, the commercial fishing board chair, isn’t ready to accept tighter quotas in the bay, but said population models should be closely watched. If the declines continue, he said, cuts may be on the table.

“A very conservative approach is going to be necessary,” he said. “Because it’s our last stronghold. If that goes away, what do we have?”

The post A Wisconsin whitefish refuge offers lessons for Michigan. But will it last? appeared first on Great Lakes Now.

Original Article

Great Lakes Now

Great Lakes Now

https://www.greatlakesnow.org/2026/03/12/a-wisconsin-whitefish-refuge-offers-lessons-for-michigan-but-will-it-last/

Kelly House, Bridge Michigan

What to know about Michigan whitefish crisis, from limits to solutions

By Kelly House, Bridge Michigan

The Great Lakes News Collaborative includes Bridge Michigan; Circle of Blue; Great Lakes Now at Detroit PBS; Michigan Public, Michigan’s NPR News Leader; and The Narwhal who work together to bring audiences news and information about the impact of climate change, pollution, and aging infrastructure on the Great Lakes and drinking water.

Read Now at Great Lakes Now.

Original Article

Great Lakes Now

Great Lakes Now

https://www.greatlakesnow.org/2025/10/what-to-know-about-michigan-whitefish-crisis-from-limits-to-solutions/

Bridge Michigan

As mussels ravage Great Lakes whitefish, Lake Superior survives — for now

By Kelly House, Bridge Michigan

The Great Lakes News Collaborative includes Bridge Michigan; Circle of Blue; Great Lakes Now at Detroit PBS; Michigan Public, Michigan’s NPR News Leader; and The Narwhal who work together to bring audiences news and information about the impact of climate change, pollution, and aging infrastructure on the Great Lakes and drinking water.

Read Now at Great Lakes Now.

Original Article

Great Lakes Now

Great Lakes Now

https://www.greatlakesnow.org/2025/09/as-mussels-ravage-great-lakes-whitefish-lake-superior-survives-for-now/

Bridge Michigan

‘We can’t regulate ourselves’ out of whitefish crisis, experts say

By Emilio Perez Ibarguen, Bridge Michigan

The Great Lakes News Collaborative includes Bridge Michigan; Circle of Blue; Great Lakes Now at Detroit PBS; Michigan Public, Michigan’s NPR News Leader; and The Narwhal who work together to bring audiences news and information about the impact of climate change, pollution, and aging infrastructure on the Great Lakes and drinking water.

Read Now at Great Lakes Now.

Original Article

Great Lakes Now

Great Lakes Now

https://www.greatlakesnow.org/2025/07/we-cant-regulate-ourselves-out-of-whitefish-crisis-experts-say/

Bridge Michigan

Dish and small spoon. Dish contains orange-pink fish eggs, known as caviar.

Wisconsin commercial fishermen will again have access to a lucrative European market for their fish roe, otherwise known as caviar, thanks to Wisconsin Sea Grant. Photo: Sharon Moen

Swedish hospitality wouldn’t be complete without a spread of crackers or bread and accompanying roe, the eggs from fish and also known as caviar. Because of Sea Grant’s role in facilitating the exchange of information, some of this roe will be coming from the Great Lakes.

A Sept. 28 decision from the World Wildlife Fund-Sweden to rank Wisconsin commercial lake whitefish and cisco fisheries as “best choice” with regard to sustainability means the roe from these fish can grace Swedish tables as a tasty, salty treat of skirom or löjrom without obstacles.  

Prior to that release of a “green, best choice” ranking for commercial fisheries in the Wisconsin and Michigan waters of Lake Superior the lake whitefish fishery, which yields sikrom, was in jeopardy. The cisco fishery of Lake Superior, which yields löjrom, was also in question. Great Lakes commercial fishers rely on the international sale of roe, a high-value product, to make ends meet.

Sharon Moen, Sea Grant’s food fish outreach coordinator, explained: “About two years ago, I was contacted by a fish processor/seafood importer/exporter operating in Door County. Because lake whitefish and cisco were rated red (unsustainable) by the World Wildlife Fund-Sweden, roe sales were plummeting as the products were being pulled from Swedish markets. The vigor with which red-rated products are leaving the Swedish marketplace has escalated each year since then. If the ratings didn’t change this year, the Great Lakes roe industry would have been devastated.”

Thanks to Moen’s intervention that rating changed from red to green early in the morning on Sept. 28 when new rankings were released. What led up to that change were Moen’s presentations to the Swedish Seafood forum, production and distribution of fact sheets on the fishery and lengthy facilitated conversations. She brought together Great Lakes fisheries managers, roe processors, the Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch staff, World Wildlife Fund-EU, World Wildlife Fund-Sweden and Swedish seafood industry leaders.

There is another “green” to celebrate, green to the tune of $15 million annually. That’s the estimate from domestic tribal and commercial fishers and processors about the worth of their anticipated roe export to Europe.

“Within minutes of my Sept. 28 joint presentation with Andy Edwards, treaty natural resources manager with the Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, the two largest retail chains in

Close-up of smiling person

Sharon Moen is the food fish outreach coordinator and brought together many parties to discuss Lake Superior lake whitefish and cisco.

Sweden contacted an importer to place orders,” said Moen.

One of those importers reached out to Moen and said, “It’s thanks to your hard work and extraordinary presentation our deepest wishes came true!,” said Tony Hartwig, CEO of Olle Hartwig Aktiebolag. “Now, we have busy days working out a market plan to promote roe again from Lake Superior, Wisconsin!”

Moen is pleased the ranking has been changed because she wholeheartedly stands by the science behind the management of the fishery and the professionalism of the commercial fishers. “From my perspective, the red rating reflected communication challenges, the complexity of Great Lakes fisheries management and the scarcity of money for a due-diligence assessment.”

As Dan Grooms said, “Fishing the Apostle Islands for food had been an integral part of the Anishinaabe’s way of life. Our fishers and our tribe depend on responsible fisheries management for sustainability for future generations.” Grooms was formerly the business manager of Red Cliff Fish Co., a business owned by the Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa.

The post Sea Grant education on fishery expected to lead to $15 million in exports to Sweden first appeared on Wisconsin Sea Grant.

Original Article

News Releases | Wisconsin Sea Grant

News Releases | Wisconsin Sea Grant

https://www.seagrant.wisc.edu/news/sea-grant-education-on-fishery-expected-to-lead-to-15-million-in-exports-to-sweden/

Moira Harrington

Anishinaabe tribes work to save a fish significant to their culture and an important source of protein

By Lester Graham, Michigan Radio

The Great Lakes News Collaborative includes Bridge Michigan; Circle of Blue; Great Lakes Now at Detroit Public Television; and Michigan Radio, Michigan’s NPR News Leader; who work together to bring audiences news and information about the impact of climate change, pollution, and aging infrastructure on the Great Lakes and drinking water.

Read Now at Great Lakes Now.

Original Article

Great Lakes Now

Great Lakes Now

https://www.greatlakesnow.org/2023/05/anishinaabe-tribes-work-save-fish-significant-culture-important-source-protein/

Michigan Radio

Michigan tribes, state reach tentative deal on Great Lakes fishing access

By Kelly House, Bridge Michigan

The Great Lakes News Collaborative includes Bridge Michigan; Circle of Blue; Great Lakes Now at Detroit Public Television; and Michigan Radio, Michigan’s NPR News Leader; who work together to bring audiences news and information about the impact of climate change, pollution, and aging infrastructure on the Great Lakes and drinking water.

Read Now at Great Lakes Now.

Original Article

Great Lakes Now

Great Lakes Now

https://www.greatlakesnow.org/2022/12/michigan-tribes-state-reach-tentative-deal-great-lakes-fishing-access/

Bridge Michigan

The Great Lakes-Iceland connection through the 100% Whitefish effort

While Great Lakes fish populations are constantly in a state of flux, one species has declined precipitously in the last decade: lake whitefish. But Great Lakes leaders and fisheries managers are looking ahead in planning to do more with less.

And in the case of whitefish, a lot more.

Read Now at Great Lakes Now.

Original Article

Great Lakes Now

Great Lakes Now

https://www.greatlakesnow.org/2022/11/great-lakes-iceland-connection-through-whitefish-effort/

James Proffitt