CHICAGO, IL (August 20, 2025) The Great Lakes region faces the prospect of water shortages, groundwater conflicts, and contaminated aquifers as demand sharply increases from large water users such as data centers, agriculture, and critical minerals mining. A new Alliance for the Great Lakes report details how access to water in the region will be undermined in the coming years if serious planning, policy, and regulatory actions are not taken. Some places in the region are already seeing these conflicts play out. 

While the Great Lakes Compact prohibits diversions of Great Lakes surface and groundwater outside the basin, Great Lakes states are facing increasing and unprecedented demand from heavy water-using sectors. Increased water demand is also rising at a time when climate change is scrambling precipitation patterns and limiting the ability of groundwater aquifers to recharge. Between 20 to 40% of the Great Lakes’ water budget the total water flowing in and out of the system originates as groundwater. 

“Industries like data centers and semiconductor chip manufacturing are choosing to locate in the Great Lakes region, in part because of its water resources along with state laws and tax incentives that encourage investment but don’t consider limited water resources. The region is simply not prepared to manage the competing and overlapping demands that may soon lead to more conflict over water resources,” said Helena Volzer, Alliance for the Great Lakes Senior Source Water Policy Manager and author of the report.  

The report A Finite Resource: Managing the Growing Water Needs of Data Centers, Critical Minerals Mining, and Agriculture in the Great Lakes Region details how a single hyperscale data center can use more than 365 million gallons of water a year, equivalent to what 12,000 Americans use in that time. Fueled by a transition to greener and cleaner technologies, the water-intensive critical minerals mining industry will also require large volumes of water. Due to hotter and drier summers, irrigation is now increasingly beginning to be used for agriculture.  

“If states, local governments, and economic development agencies do not begin incorporating water availability and demand into their decision-making processes, it may lead the region down a dangerous, unsustainable, and inefficient water use path that impacts drinking water supplies, businesses, and food production,” Volzer said.   

While the report explores the challenges facing Great Lakes’ water use, it also offers a suite of potential solutions including:  

  • Require disclosure of proposed water and energy use to inform decision-making. There are no water use reporting or tracking requirements for data centers that purchase water from municipal water supplies, so less then ⅓ of data centers even track water use.  
  • Set energy and water conservation and efficiency standards for hyperscale data centers and large water using industries. 
  • Conduct regional water demand studies and groundwater mapping to determine capacity as part of ongoing conservation programs and for use in economic development decision-making. 
  • Eliminate sales and use tax incentives specific to data centers. 
  • Examine consumptive use permit thresholds to determine if they are appropriate in the face of both new demand, simultaneously converging demands, and climate change. 
  • Revise state groundwater management laws to allow state agencies to curb groundwater use where adverse groundwater impacts are likely but have not yet occurred.  

The report details how the states are fortunate to have the existing Great Lakes Compact, which is a solid foundation and cooperative agreement on which these solutions can build. 

###

Contact: Don Carr, Media Director, dcarr@greatlakes.org

Protect the Great Lakes

Your contribution supports groundbreaking research and analysis that protects the Great Lakes today and far into the future.

Give a Gift Today

The post Great Lakes Region Unprepared for Increasing Water Use Demands appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2025/08/great-lakes-region-unprepared-for-increasing-water-use-demands/

Judy Freed

Summary

The Director of Water Resources (Director) will lead the Alliance’s work to protect Great Lakes natural water resources. They will use policy, scientific and social research, and analysis to build the case for the policy and funding action necessary to ensure the Great Lakes are sustained for today and tomorrow. This includes, but is not limited to, protection of source water quality and quantity, reduction of polluted runoff, and prevention of invasive species. The Director will lead a team of full-time staff to develop high-quality analyses, reports, and recommendations that drive Great Lakes policy. They will build and sustain external partnerships with scientists, engineers, trade groups, eNGOs, and agency staff to ensure Alliance recommendations are built on solid data and positioned to drive policy innovation and reform. The Director will serve as a thought leader and convener within the Great Lakes water community. They will be a public figure for the organization who speaks with authority and diplomacy, and who cultivates relationships that further the Alliance’s clean water and ecosystem goals. The Director collaborates with the Alliance’s internal advocacy staff to build the campaign structures and relationships necessary to advance policy change. The Director will provide counsel to the Alliance’s Vice Presidents and the President & CEO on policy work across the region. They will be responsible for supervising and mentoring a growing expert staff to inspire high performance and job satisfaction.

A typical week

In a typical week, the Director of Water Resources might:

  • Analyze state legislation related to reducing agricultural runoff into the Great Lakes
  • Convene water partners to explore joint advocacy opportunities and messaging on key water policy issues
  • Draft or review a report, blog post, or press release that communicates our findings and recommendations on water use trends
  • Deliver a conference presentation on our work related to agriculture and water policy that outlines challenges and opportunities
  • Facilitate a meeting with project partners to define roles, timelines, and key deliverables to advance a new initiative to protect water resources in the Basin
  • Brief leadership on an emerging Great Lakes issue and how the Alliance could respond
  • Participate in webinars to learn more best practices for equitable stakeholder engagement on policy issues, best practices in water management, and policy solutions that should be explored in the Great Lakes states
  • Check in with direct reports on progress on their deliverables and provide feedback, coaching and support in problem-solving

Responsibilities

Strategist

  • Recommends organizational goals and related research and policy advocacy agendas to protect and restore water source and ecosystem integrity, with an initial emphasis on addressing agricultural pollution, source water quantity and quality, and prevention and control of invasive species
  • Identifies and advances opportunities to evolve organizational strategy and fill regional gaps on ecosystems work in additional areas such as coastal restoration, contamination cleanup, and protection of ecologically important waters
  • Serves as the primary communicator to Alliance staff leadership and Board of Directors on ecosystem issues
  • Communicates and advances the Alliance’s water and ecosystems work as a thought partner to the major institutional philanthropies that support this work

Advocate

  • Accountable for delivering policy change for the Alliance’s water resource work across the Great Lakes region
  • Leads creation of work products, with internal and external collaborators, such as reports, data analysis, and presentations to advance thought leadership of the Alliance with decision makers and influential partners
  • Creates regular short-term policy, organizing and communication successes as we advance toward our long-term goals
  • Ensures policy goals are achievable and connected to real-world outcomes that have an impact on the quality of water resources and the lives of people who depend on them
  • Prioritizes and strengthens long-term relationships with key thought leaders and partners who can drive practical research and policy change
  • Ensures Alliance advocacy agendas are mutually supportive of our partner organizations and relevant coalitions
  • Builds and leverages relationships outside of the traditional environmental community, including with academia, trade associations, community-based and environmental justice leaders, businesses, and state and local governments
  • Supports Alliance advocacy team in creation and implementation of policy campaigns, which may include coalition building, earned media, organizational supporter activation, briefing and testimony for decision makers, conference presentations and other external relations activities

Manager

  • Manages a team of policy and issue experts and analysts
  • Motivates and mentors staff that work in multiple locations as team members, peers and collaborators
  • Establishes and manages to multiyear expense budgets and work plans to implement the strategic plan
  • Manages a range of projects including direct data collection, secondary scientific research, stakeholder engagement, and creation of policy recommendations
  • Builds and maintains relationships with program staff at institutional philanthropic supporters and develops proposals and reports to advance grant-funded work of program
  • Engages in regular reflection on and cultivation of a values-based organizational culture

Work Relationships

The Director reports to the Vice President for Programs. The Director collaborates regularly with the advocacy team to advance organizational campaign work, and collaborates with the Director of Clean Water and Equity to ensure internal and external coordination of policy objectives. They collaborate regularly with the Finance and Operations Team on project and budget management.

Supervisory Responsibilities

The Director supervises two Senior Policy Manager positions and one contractor, with team growth expected over the next two years.

Physical Demands/Work Environment

This position is remote and will be located within the Great Lakes watershed, with a preference for a part of the region impacted by current work, and for proximity to a major airport. Overnight travel within the Great Lakes region is required, with an average of once per month. A driver’s license and comfort with solo travel by car is required. If the candidate is located in the Chicago area, the Alliance’s downtown headquarters office is available for in-office work.

Knowledge/Skills

  • Leadership ability as demonstrated by a track record of successful problem identification and analysis, relationship and partnership building, conflict resolution, and strategic decision-making both internal and external to an organization
  • Demonstrated success at building recommendations that motivate key influencers to act in a coordinated and strategic manner
  • Strong existing network of relevant and influential leaders in one or more areas of issue and geographic focus for this work
  • Prior demonstrated success at managing multiple closely aligned and well-coordinated policy priorities at the same time
  • Fundamental commitment and demonstrated skills in advancing diversity, equity, inclusion and justice principles in ecosystems work
  • Top echelon skills at writing and speaking to motivate powerful people
  • Staff management and/or mentoring experience
  • Experience with and commitment to use of project management software
  • Driven by a strong commitment to public interest work and the values of the organization
  • Optimistic outlook both internally and externally
  • Committed to a big-tent approach to water advocacy that brings together science, data, relationships, stories and winning strategy
  • Bachelor’s degree required, advanced degree preferred (leadership of significant past successful policy projects or campaigns may substitute for advanced degree)
  • Minimum of 7 years of experience culminating in proven leadership of state, regional or national scale policy, scientific and/or legal research and analysis leading to policy change
  • Understands and upholds Alliance for the Great Lakes values of community, relationships, courage, integrity, and optimism
  • Demonstrated alignment with our external and internal operating principles of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion
  • The selected candidate must be able to pass a background check

Job Parameters

  • This position is full-time and consistent with Alliance employment policy. The Alliance has defined salary ranges that are evaluated annually, and it is customary for candidates to join at the lower half of the range to leave room for learning and development in the role. It is uncommon for starting salaries to fall above the mid-point. The salary range for this position begins at $105,000 and we negotiate salaries with final candidates based on their experience in similar roles and expertise related to the qualifications.
  • Excellent benefits, including medical, dental, short- and long-term disability, life insurance, FSA, 11 paid holidays plus the business days between 12/26 and 12/30 (staff who must work on any paid holidays may take those holidays at another time subject to the employee handbook), 3 weeks’ annual vacation to start + PTO, and Fidelity 401(k) with employer match of up to 6% of salary, eligible after 30 days.
  • This position can be performed remotely from anywhere within the Great Lakes region, with a preference for a part of the region impacted by current work, and for proximity to a major airport.

Application Process

Please e-mail a cover letter, resume, references, and writing or work sample that demonstrates relevant qualifications to hr@greatlakes.org. Include the job title in the subject line.

Applications will be accepted and reviewed on a rolling basis starting on July 17th, 2025 and until the position is filled. Materials should be compatible with Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat. Applicants will receive confirmation of receipt of their materials, further guidance, and updates about the hiring process by e-mail, with interviews provided for finalists. No phone inquiries, please.

About the Alliance for the Great Lakes

Our vision is a thriving Great Lakes and healthy water that all life can rely on, today and far into the future.

The mission of the Alliance for the Great Lakes is to protect, conserve, and restore the Great Lakes, ensuring healthy water in the lakes and in our communities for all generations of people and wildlife.

To achieve our vision and mission, everyone in our organization will live our values of Community, Relationships, Courage, Integrity and Optimism, and weave the principles of Justice, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion into all our work.

For more information about the Alliance’s programs and work, please visit us online at greatlakes.org.

The post Director of Water Resources appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2025/07/director-of-water-resources/

Judy Freed

Earlier this year, we asked our Illinois supporters to send a message to their legislators: keep plastic pollution out of the Great Lakes and our drinking water. Our supporters delivered in a big way! They sent over 1,750 messages to Illinois legislators – and they asked their friends and colleagues to send messages, too.

Thanks to our supporters, a key bill has made major steps forward. Legislation that would phase out the sale of single-use plastic foam cups and food containers has passed the Illinois Senate and the House Energy and Environment Committee. Our next step is passing it out of the Illinois House and moving this critical bill to the Governor’s desk. We will be working hard to get it over the finish line this year.

Plastic foam, most commonly known as Styrofoam, is the third most common litter item collected during our Adopt-a-Beach cleanups. Foam is exceptionally hard to recycle and breaks down easily into toxic environmental microplastic particles. This critical bill reduces plastic pollution at the source by restricting the sale and distribution of foam food containers. 

We’re so grateful to everyone who made an impact in advancing this important legislation!

In a related bill, the Illinois General Assembly has passed the PFAS Product Ban, which is now on its way to the Governor for his signature. PFAS is one among thousands of chemicals used in the manufacturing of some plastics. This important bill will prohibit the use of this toxic chemical in the manufacturing of children’s products, cosmetics, intimate apparel such as sleepwear or underwear, menstrual products, and dental floss. This law represents a significant step in reducing the use of toxic chemicals in manufacturing.

We’ll continue pushing for legislation – like the foam food ware phase-out – that reduces plastic pollution in Illinois. We’ll keep you up to date on our progress and ways you can continue making a difference. Together we can make a lasting impact to ensure clean drinking water and protect our beautiful Lake Michigan.

Thank you again for protecting Lake Michigan and our drinking water!

2X MATCH: Stand Up Against Plastic Pollution

This July, your donation doubles! Together, we can protect the Great Lakes from plastic pollution and ensure these waters are clean for future generations.

Donate Today

The post Plastic Foam Legislation Advances in Illinois appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2025/07/plastic-foam-legislation-advances-in-illinois/

Judy Freed

CHICAGO, IL (June 26, 2025) – Today, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced its prediction for the size and scope of the now-annual Lake Erie Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB). The 2025 projection is for the bloom to be mild to moderate. In response, the Alliance for the Great Lakes is highlighting how the current use of solely voluntary incentives to reduce the blooms has failed to meet the phosphorous reduction targets agreed to by Ohio and Michigan. The group calls on the states to change tactics and start targeting pollution reduction funding and best management practices to the places where they are needed most.

“Ten years ago, Ohio and Michigan agreed to reduce nutrient pollution entering Lake Erie by 40 percent in 2025. They have failed to meet that target, while yet another harmful algal bloom forecast has become the new normal for our Great Lakes. Residents are paying higher water bills to monitor and remove toxins from their drinking water. The commercial and recreational fishing industries and the jobs they support are impacted. Algal blooms close beaches and cause respiratory problems in people. Water utilities are addressing the symptoms to keep drinking water safe – but we are not treating all the root causes of the disease,” said Joel Brammeier, President & CEO of the Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Utilizing only voluntary measures limits what states can achieve. While many farmers are adopting the practices needed to reduce polluted runoff, the last decade proves that’s not enough to stop the algae. While the 2025 projection for the bloom is mild to moderate, the bloom severity index does not indicate toxicity. Smaller blooms can be more toxic. The states can make faster progress by ensuring farmer adoption of practices at the scale needed to get to 40% and by monitoring water quality to target areas with the most contaminated runoff and measuring the actual performance of these practices on the ground to know if the water is getting cleaner.

It has been over a decade since more than 400,000 people in western Lake Erie lost access to drinking water due to a harmful algal bloom fueled mainly by pollution from agriculture. That was a wake-up call about the consequences of inaction. Launched in 2019, the H2Ohio program is the state’s flagship water quality program dedicated to reducing and preventing HABs and improving access to clean and safe drinking water. But just yesterday, the Ohio General Assembly reversed course and opted to cut funding for the program by 39 percent — shrinking the budgets of the state agencies tasked with implementing the program by more than $50 million dollars.

“Algal blooms are a systemic problem, and they require a systemic solution across millions of acres. Missing the 2025 deadline doesn’t mean we walk away – it means we get more aggressive. The right combination of voluntary action, funding, and policy can put Lake Erie back on track for safe and clean water for all.” Brammeier said.

Related:

2022 Alliance for the Great Lakes report: Downstream Water Users Bear Financial Burden of Upstream Pollution

2024 Alliance for the Great Lakes announcement of Monitoring Milestone in Fight Against Lake Erie Pollution in partnership with the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development

2025 University of Michigan report: Living near harmful algal blooms reduces life expectancy with ALS

# # #

Contact: Don Carr, Media Director, Alliance for the Great Lakes, dcarr@greatlakes.org

More about Nutrient Pollution

Read more about agricultural runoff and harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie.

Read More

The post Toxic Algal Blooms Should Not Be the New Normal appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2025/06/toxic-algal-blooms-should-not-be-the-new-normal/

Judy Freed

Columbus, OH (May 21, 2025) — Rep. Dontavius Jarrells (D-Columbus) and Rep. Monica Robb Blasdel (R-Columbiana) introduced important legislation designed to eliminate all lead water lines that still exist in the state of Ohio. The Lead Line Replacement Act aims to get the lead out of Ohio’s drinking water systems by requiring all public water systems to fully replace lead service lines within 15 years. The legislation includes key provisions that support workforce development and ensure that low- and moderate-income customers will not be burdened by the cost of lead line replacement.

Organizations — including the Alliance for the Great Lakes, the Junction Coalition, and Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund — applauded the legislative efforts.

Ohio currently ranks third in the nation for the most lead pipes serving families, with an estimated 745,000 still in use. Removing these lead lines is critical to protecting Ohioans from the threat of lead exposure in drinking water. Health experts agree, exposure to lead, even at low levels, can cause serious health effects in all age groups, but especially in children. Lead poisoning from consuming contaminated water can cause irreversible brain damage in children that may take years to emerge. Exposure during adulthood increases the risk of heart disease as well as kidney and nervous system problems. A report completed by Scioto Analysis shows the monetized social benefit of full lead pipe replacement will grow Ohio’s economy by between $145 and $185 billion cumulatively over the next 15 years.

The following quote can be attributed, in whole or in part, to Annalisa Rocca, Drinking Water Manager for the Ohio Environmental Council (OEC) Action Fund:

“Many Ohioans are practically drinking water from a lead straw due to the state’s 745,000 active lead service lines. The Lead Line Replacement Act is a powerful bipartisan bill that is a step forward for Ohio’s communities and families. It sends a clear message that clean, safe drinking water isn’t a partisan issue; it’s a basic human need that deserves action. The Lead Line Replacement Act is more than smart policy, it reflects a shared commitment to protecting public health, supporting jobs, and building a stronger, healthier Ohio.”

The following quote can be attributed, in whole or in part, to Meleah Geertsma, Alliance for the Great Lakes’ Director of Clean Water and Equity.

“There are no safe levels of lead. The Lead Line Replacement Act will bring huge health and economic benefits to the region by reducing negative impacts to child development and improving cardiovascular health.”

The following quote can be attributed, in whole or in part, to Archie Beasley, Program Director for the Junction Coalition.

“We need a comprehensive approach to getting the lead out in Ohio. It starts with the Ohio Lead Line Replacement Act, which will remove and replace the lead water lines that bring water into the homes in our communities.”

###

Contact: Karlena Wallace, Communications Director, Ohio Environmental Council, media@theoec.org or 614-487-7506

Replacing Lead Water Pipes

Lead pipes that carry drinking water into homes pose a serious health concern for many Great Lakes residents. Great Lakes states have some of the highest numbers of lead pipes in the nation.

Learn More

The post Environmental Organizations Celebrate Bipartisan Bill to Remove Ohio’s Lead Service Lines to Improve Drinking Water appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2025/05/environmental-organizations-celebrate-bipartisan-bill-to-remove-ohios-lead-service-lines-to-improve-drinking-water/

Judy Freed

CHICAGO, IL (May 2, 2025) – Efforts to keep the Great Lakes healthy and ensure the drinking water for 40 million people is safe to consume would be deeply harmed by the Trump Administration’s budget proposal announced today.

“We’re disappointed to see the President’s budget rejects core funding to restore safe drinking water, protect our communities from sewage and flooding, and implement federal clean water protections. We look forward to working with Congress to fund these vital Great Lakes programs,” said Joel Brammeier, President and CEO of the Alliance for the Great Lakes.”

### 

Contact: Don Carr, Media Director, Alliance for the Great Lakes dcarr@greatlakes.org 

2025 Great Lakes Federal Policy Priorities

The federal government plays an essential role in protecting clean water.

Read More

The post Trump Budget Puts Great Lakes at Risk  appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2025/05/trump-budget-puts-great-lakes-at-risk/

Judy Freed

Joel Brammeier headshot.
Joel Brammeier, ​President & CEO

Boaters have a special connection to the Great Lakes. You love the water. You spend your precious free time maintaining your watercraft so you can enjoy all the beauty the Great Lakes have to offer. And you’re also among the first to be impacted when problems occur.  

Problems like invasive quagga mussels clogging boat engines and jamming steering equipment or startled invasive carp launching themselves airborne into your passengers. You’ve likely encountered foul, smelly, and potentially toxic algal blooms now appearing on all the Great Lakes. You witness trash floating in the water and discarded plastic littering beaches.  

Because you have a special connection to the lakes, you’re in a great position to make a difference in your daily boating routine. First, consider cutting back on plastics, especially single-use items. For over 20 years, thousands of dedicated volunteers in our Adopt-a-Beach clean-up program have removed more than 9.7 million individual pieces of trash and more than 535,000 pounds of litter from Great Lakes shorelines. Of that litter, 86% was plastic. While individuals cutting back on plastics can make a big difference, ultimately, we need stronger rules that hold plastic producers responsible for the plastic pollution they create. Consider learning more about these policies and contacting your representatives in support of them. 

For invasive species, making sure boats and trailers are free of all aquatic organisms and plants before putting in or trailering out is key. There’s also power in numbers. Organize your fellow boaters at your marina or boating club. You can even become an Alliance for the Great Lakes Ambassador or host your own Adopt-a-Beach cleanup.  

Community is especially critical in tackling broader environmental challenges. Talk to your neighbors and spread the word about the importance of the Great Lakes. Reach out to your elected officials about restoring local shorelines and cleaning up pollution. Did you know there’s an important bill pending right now in the U.S. Congress called the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative? The bill renews critical funding for projects across the Great Lakes that’s set to expire. It goes to habitat restoration, helps farmers with field run-off that fuels algal blooms, cleans up legacy pollution and toxic sediments, and prevents the establishment or spread of destructive invasive species. 

To date, the GLRI program has funded more than 7,563 individual projects totaling $3.7 billion, greatly improving the quality of life throughout the region. The GLRI also provides major economic benefits, as it is estimated that for every dollar spent, an additional three dollars of value is added to the regional economy.    

At the Alliance for the Great Lakes, we work across the region to protect, conserve, and restore the Great Lakes, ensuring healthy water in the lakes and in our communities for all generations of people and wildlife. The Lakes’ boating community is a vibrant and critical component of that effort, and we invite you to learn more about the Alliance and how you can get involved

This piece was first published in Great Lakes Scuttlebutt magazine.

Connect Your Boating Club with Alliance for the Great Lakes

Contact us to discuss how your club can partner with the Alliance! We offer fun and educational ways to engage your members, and we can create custom opportunities tailor-made for your club. Email Jon Heuring, jheuring@greatlakes.org.

Contact Us About Partnering With Your Boating Club

The post How Boaters Can Help Protect the Great Lakes   appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2025/03/how-boaters-can-help-protect-the-great-lakes/

Judy Freed

A question looms for the Great Lakes: with our water protected from diversion to far-flung locales, are we equally ready for an influx of big new water users here at home?

The Great Lakes hold the world’s largest supply of surface freshwater. It is a truly massive amount of water – but also a finite resource that must be managed responsibly for today and tomorrow. The 8 Great Lakes states and 2 Canadian provinces wisely recognized this when they agreed to the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact (Compact) and provincial Agreement. The Compact and Agreement do four things:

  1. Prohibit diversions of Great Lakes water (with limited exceptions);
  2. Require the states to manage their own Great Lakes water use within the Basin;
  3. Set water conservation and efficiency goals and objectives; and
  4. Establish common water use reporting protocols.

The Compact’s prohibition on diversions ensures that Great Lakes water stays in the Great Lakes Basin. Proposals to pipe Great Lakes water for any use to a location far outside the Great Lakes region are legally not in the cards – the Compact prohibits it. Any exception to the diversion prohibition can happen only in a county that is partially in the Basin, and the water must be returned after use. Beyond the legal constraints, moving vast amounts of Great Lakes water away from our region makes no economic or logistic sense. The good news is this means that Great Lakes water will be staying in the Great Lakes.

But our abundance also makes the Great Lakes region attractive to industries that require large amounts of water.

Rapid Growth Driving Unprecedented Demand

Historically, this meant steel production, petroleum refining, agriculture, and power generation. Today’s growth industries look somewhat different. To be clear, all large-scale water use has the potential to impact our water supply. However, the rapid growth of digital consumption of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI), cloud computing, internet of things, and digital services is driving an unprecedented demand for new data centers. Growth projections vary and depend on a variety of factors, but we can make a few generalizations about the trends in this region:

  • Demand for data centers is rapidly increasing.
  • Gen AI is a key driver of the growth, requiring vast data processing capabilities.
  • The type of hyperscale data centers that can handle big tasks require both large quantities of electricity and water for cooling.

Hyperscale data centers can take up over 10,000 square feet of floor space and house over 5,000 servers that demand water and electricity 24 hours a day. How much water a data center needs varies depending on the size and type of cooling technology used, but hyperscale data centers can use between 1 and 5 million gallons of water per day (MGD) when evaporative cooling, currently the most common method, is the method used.

To put this in perspective, a hyperscale data center that uses 365 million gallons in a year (or 1 MGD) is equivalent to what roughly 12,000 Americans use in a year.

How Do Data Centers Use Water?

Most of the water used in evaporative cooling is used consumptively – meaning the water is not returned to the watershed, but rather, as the name implies, lost to evaporation. The increased pace of this consumption is also alarming. A new report shows that in 2023, U.S. data centers directly consumed about 17.4 billion gallons of water, and the authors expect that figure to double by 2028. Yet only 1% of the water in the Great Lakes is renewed each year, underscoring the hard choices and complex planning that goes into keeping sustainable amounts of water available.  

Other cooling methods such as liquid immersion or direct-to-chip cooling consume less water and electricity by directly using water to cool equipment but can introduce contaminants in the process. These methods may be more efficient from a water consumption standpoint but will pose water quality questions. Air cooling is another alternative but uses more electricity. Finally, the reuse of non-potable water and recirculation have the potential to offset consumptive use, but these technologies are not contemplated by most states’ laws and therefore take more time and effort to finalize partnerships and to permit. There also isn’t good data to show how many data centers are adopting them.

Generating electricity to meet data centers’ needs via coal, natural gas, or nuclear fired power plants also requires water. Some refer to this relationship between water and energy generation as part of the “water-energy nexus.” Per the Great Lakes Regional Water Use Database, 70% of Great Lakes reported water use in 2023 was associated with generating electrical power. That’s overall water use (not the percentage of consumptive use), and that percentage generally matches each state’s water use as well. Because the electric utility is the entity that reports its water use and corresponding consumptive use to the Database, we don’t have a clear understanding of what the total water footprint of an individual data center or the data center industry is.

New research also shows that it’s taken just four years for the total capacity of hyperscale data centers (megawatts of load a data center can handle) to double, while both the number of facilities and average capacity rapidly climb. To meet the demand on existing power grids, states will have to add capacity while also meeting state renewable energy targets. In some states, that may necessitate reactivating or expanding nuclear power plants. That’s already happening in Michigan (Palisades), New York (Three Mile Island), and Ontario (Bruce). In others like Ohio, it’s driving the construction of new natural gas plants. The corresponding increase in the cumulative use of water by data centers – both in their indirect energy needs and direct cooling needs must be better quantified and understood.

Transparency is Key

Data centers should be transparent about their total water footprint from the early stages of proposed development. They should also have systems in place to accurately measure water use. It’s estimated that less than one-third of data centers are currently tracking water usage. In the Great Lakes states, when a large water user obtains its water through a municipal water system that has the capacity to supply it, the obligation to track and report water usage rests with that system – not the water user.

Without information about what a data center proposes to use up front and reporting to determine how much water is being used, it’s not possible to fully understand and assess the impact of an individual data center or any large water using industry on a water resource. Better accounting and reporting requirements are needed to guide decision making and protect water resources.

At the same time, state legislatures, economic development agencies, and local governments are inviting data centers to locate in the Great Lakes region with tax incentives and other benefits packages. But when decisions are being made about where to incentivize development, water doesn’t appear to be holistically factored into the equation. That can and should change as states (like Ohio and Indiana) are undertaking studies to better understand water demand and capacity. If not, states may max out an area with data centers and not have the capacity to handle any other type of growth or economic development. Without careful planning, it could also have unintended consequences like depleting groundwater availability in existing private drinking water wells and wells used for agricultural irrigation.

A data center can employ as few as 10 to more than 100 people, depending on its size – but supports 6.5 jobs for every one job directly employed. If data centers turn out to be the economic development engine they have been touted as, then that may drive population growth, further increasing the demand for both water and electricity. For example, the Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area, where data centers are being constructed at a very rapid rate, was the fastest growing city in the U.S. for the second half of 2023.

Climate Change is Scrambling Assumptions

Climate change impacts on surface and groundwater supplies compounds these issues and underscores the need for detailed planning and informed resource management. State laws and regulations are currently not designed to proactively manage water resources in anticipation of how climate change will reshape surface and groundwater flows, large scale water uses, and population patterns. This is especially true for groundwater. While the majestic surface waters of the Great Lakes are prominent in the minds of many, between 40-75% of Great Lakes state residents get their drinking water from groundwater – much of it connected to the Great Lakes.

States should be examining all large-scale water uses of groundwater, including for data centers, to determine whether they’re appropriate in a given watershed or basin and whether those uses pose enough of a threat to other nearby watersheds that the use should be avoided altogether. This examination should include assessment of not only whether supply can meet demand, but what impact the use will have environmentally and ecologically on the resource.

As climate change continues to dramatically alter precipitation patterns, laws will also need to change and adapt in concert to ensure there’s enough water to support economic development and protect our most precious shared freshwater resource, the Great Lakes.

The Great Lakes Compact

The Great Lakes hold 90% of North America’s fresh surface water. But this water supply is not unlimited. Learn how the Great Lakes Compact protects the lakes.

Learn More

The post Data Centers Are Increasing in the Great Lakes at What Cost? appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2025/03/data-centers-are-increasing-in-the-great-lakes-at-what-cost/

Judy Freed

Joel Brammeier headshot.
Joel Brammeier, ​President & CEO

Invasive carp are headed toward the Great Lakes, advancing up the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers where they have already wreaked havoc. The Brandon Road project – a series of underwater deterrents and barriers at an existing lock in Illinois – is our best chance to stop them before they threaten the region’s $5.1 billion fishing and $16 billion recreational boating industries.

To date, the U.S. Congress has appropriated $274 million, and the States of Illinois and Michigan have provided $114 million and signed a project partnership agreement detailing their respective obligations to move the project forward. Initial contracts have been awarded for the first phase of construction. Work is underway.

On Tuesday, the project’s groundbreaking celebration was put on hold when Illinois put a temporary pause on transferring some land needed for the project. The state wants assurances from the Trump Administration that future federal funding will be available for the project so that it can be finished.

Any delay or halt of construction of this project threatens the economy and environment of the Great Lakes and opens the door to yet another invasive species to do irreversible damage to the Great Lakes and to the people who call it home.

This is yet another example of the ways federal funding is critical to the Great Lakes. While this project site is located in Illinois, it will benefit every Great Lakes state. Invasive carp don’t stop at state lines. We’re fortunate that the project, which has been guided by more than a decade of advocacy, enjoys broad support across the region and in Congress from members of both parties.  

We will continue to watch this closely and will update you when there are new developments. And we’ll continue speaking out in support of the project, including in these stories this week:

Chicago Tribune: Pritzker delays start of invasive carp project at Brandon Road in Joliet amid federal funding concerns

WGN TV: Asian Carp barrier project on Des Plaines River delayed as federal funds hang in limbo

NBC 5 Chicago: State delays Joliet invasive carp project over ‘anticipated lack of funding’

Chicago PBS: Illinois Puts Invasive Carp Barrier on Hold, Pritzker Says Trump Administration Can’t Be Trusted as Funding Partner

Wisconsin Public Radio: Illinois delays project to keep invasive carp out of Great Lakes, cites uncertainty over federal funding

Speak Out for the Great Lakes

The Great Lakes can’t speak for themselves. But you can speak out for them! Contact your elected officials, take a pledge, or work for change in your own community.

Take Action

The post Update: Keeping Invasive Carp Out of the Great Lakes appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2025/02/update-keeping-invasive-carp-out-of-the-great-lakes/

Judy Freed

Significant progress continues to be made in protecting and restoring the Great Lakes, but much more needs to be done. The federal government plays a major role in this work by funding projects, administering programs, and enforcing rules. With a permanent presence in Washington, D.C., the Alliance for the Great Lakes advocates to federal decision makers to ensure the region’s voices are heard. We update and release our federal priorities each year.

2025 Federal Great Lakes Policy Priorities.

Although increased federal funding from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act allowed states and the federal government to address drinking and wastewater infrastructure backlogs, removal of lead water service lines, and the cleanup of toxic legacy pollution, we still have too many Great Lakers experiencing polluted water too often. Invasive species continue to threaten the lakes, nutrient runoff from agriculture causes toxic algae blooms, and plastic pollutes our shorelines and contaminates our drinking water.

In our 2025 federal policy priorities, we’ve identified opportunities for the 119th Congress and the Trump Administration to address these challenges in collaboration with states and local communities. Many of these priorities are familiar systemic problems that take time to resolve. But as we’ve shown through efforts like stopping invasive carp, working on a big challenge for a decade or more is often what it takes to finally get the right solution.

For the upcoming year, Congress and the Trump Administration must work together to pass an annual federal budget to provide states with sufficient federal resources to fix our ailing water infrastructure; enact a Farm Bill that will reduce the flow of nutrient pollution into the lakes; maintain progress on key federal projects intended to stop invasive species, including the Brandon Road Interbasin Project; and provide funding for, and reauthorize, the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative to continue support for on-the-ground restoration projects benefiting many communities throughout the Great Lakes region. Water pollution, and the resulting health and economic burdens, fall unequally on people in cities and towns across the Great Lakes. Federal decision makers should shape policy to ensure that all Great Lakers have access to safe, clean, and affordable water.

Read on for full details of our 2025 Great Lakes federal policy priorities, or download the fact sheet to learn more.

Water infrastructure.

Ensure clean water protects the health of people and natural resources

Clean water is a basic need for all. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act passed by Congress late in 2021 was an important down payment to fix the nation’s failing and outdated water infrastructure. The funding jump-started efforts to replace dangerous lead pipes, fix leaky pipes, and stop sewage overflows from entering our lakes and people’s homes.

However, the funding is only a start and recent surveys indicate that water infrastructure needs have grown in the last several years. EPA’s 7th national Drinking Water Needs Information Survey and Assessment, completed in 2023, and the Clean Watershed Needs Survey completed in 2024, estimate that the Great Lakes region will need at least $290.3 billion over the next twenty years to fix our water infrastructure problems. This is an increase from the last national surveys and indicates that federal funding is not keeping up with needs. As a result, we need to keep the pressure on Congress to provide additional funds for water infrastructure programs and to strengthen them to ensure that money reaches communities with the highest needs. One of the most important ways the federal government provides this infrastructure funding to states and municipalities is through State Revolving Funds.

In addition, in 2024 the EPA released its first-ever Water Affordability Needs Assessment, which found that 12.1 to 19.2 million households lack access to affordable water service. This is a major public health risk that compels urgent federal action. One of the recommendations in the report is for Congress to pass legislation establishing a national water affordability program. We agree and plan to work with our partners and Congress to advocate for the establishment of a national water affordability program.

In 2025, we urge Congress to:

  • Increase annual funding to at least $9.3 billion for the Drinking Water and Clean Water State Revolving Funds
  • Set aside at least 20 percent of the Clean Water State Revolving Fund as grants for green infrastructure projects such as green roofs, permeable pavement, and additional green spaces
  • Pass a federal ban on residential water shutoffs
  • Establish a federal program to provide financial assistance for water and sewer bills

In 2025, we urge the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to:

  • Require that states accepting federal funds increase funding and technical assistance for communities bearing the greatest burden of pollution so that they are equipped to apply for and receive funding through State Revolving Funds to replace toxic lead water pipes, repair malfunctioning sewers, and stop community flooding

Download the water infrastructure fact sheet.

Great Lakes restoration.

Fund and reauthorize the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative

The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) is one of the most important tools in the region’s toolbox to protect and restore the lakes. The program has provided funding with near-universal bipartisan and public support for on-the-ground restoration projects, from wetland restoration to cleaning up toxic hot spots. The GLRI also provides major economic benefits. For every dollar spent by the program, an additional three dollars of value is added to the regional economy. In 2024, EPA relied on up-to-date science and extensive input from across the Great Lakes to issue the five-year Action Plan IV for the program to address the most critical threats to the region. The GLRI is also supporting significant progress to address the removal of toxic legacy pollution at Areas of Concern, a number of highly degraded areas that require extensive remediation throughout the Great Lakes.

In 2025, we urge Congress to:

  • Fund the GLRI with at least $475 million for FY 2026
  • Reauthorize the GLRI program at $500 million per year for five years from FY 2027-2031

In 2025, we urge the Environmental Protection Agency to:

  • Propose the authorized level of GLRI funding at $475 million for FY 2026
  • Make progress on finishing cleanup of most Areas of Concern by 2030, and implement Action Plan IV to address community needs for Great Lakes restoration

Download the Great Lakes restoration fact sheet.

Agriculture.

Pass a Farm Bill that prioritizes clean water

Agriculture is the largest unaddressed source of nonpoint pollution in the Great Lakes region. Nonpoint pollution is pollution that doesn’t come from a single identifiable source such as a pipe, but instead originates from many places over a wide area. This runoff from agricultural lands puts the Great Lakes at risk. It pollutes drinking water by causing toxic algal blooms, threatens wildlife, harms the tourism economy, and prevents people from enjoying recreation on the Great Lakes. Ultimately these problems demand that the agriculture industry demonstrate it can operate safely without fouling our water.

Every five years, Congress develops a “Farm Bill,” a major package of legislation that sets the agenda and funding for national farm and food policy. Congress passed one-year extensions of the Farm Bill in 2023 and 2024, so in 2025 Congress can pass a Farm Bill that ensures farms produce clean water, not pollution, along with their crops.

In 2025, we urge Congress to pass a Farm Bill that:

  • Increases funding for U.S. Department of Agriculture conservation programs
  • Includes provisions to ensure accountability for farm conservation programs aimed at stopping runoff pollution from agricultural lands

Download the agriculture fact sheet.

Plastic pollution.

Pass legislation to stop plastic pollution

Researchers estimate that 22 million pounds of plastic pollution enter the Great Lakes each year. Plastic pollution isn’t just an unsightly problem in our waterways. It’s estimated that humans ingest a credit card-sized amount of plastic each week, with unknown long-term consequences for our health.

For many years, efforts to stop plastic pollution put the responsibility on individuals, such as recycling. But only a fraction of plastic produced each year is recycled, leaving the remainder to end up in landfills or as litter that lands in our waterways. The alternative is to require plastic producers to be responsible for their products through their lifecycle, which is called extended producer responsibility. Congress has an opportunity to be a leader on this issue.

In 2025, we urge Congress to pass legislation that:

  • Makes plastic producers responsible for reduction of plastic waste
  • Reduces the federal government’s use of single-use plastics including polystyrene foam
  • Funds additional research on the public health impact of plastics

Download the plastic pollution fact sheet.

Invasive Species.

Protect the Great Lakes from aquatic invasive species

Invasive species have caused irreparable harm to the Great Lakes ecosystem and cost the region billions of dollars at least since the mid-20th century. Preventing them from ever entering is the best way to protect the Great Lakes. Invasive bighead and silver carp are still a major risk. Established populations of invasive carp are only 50 miles from Chicago and Lake Michigan. But it’s not too late to prevent them from reaching the lakes. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is implementing additional carp prevention measures at the Brandon Road Lock and Dam near Joliet, Illinois. The facility is fully authorized by Congress, supported by the Great Lakes states, and is a critical choke point in the waterways leading to Lake Michigan. Congress and federal agencies must continue to support this project, which has broken ground and is under construction.

In 2025, we urge Congress to:

  • Provide federal funding to initiate the design and engineering phase for the second increment of construction (the first increment is underway) at the Brandon Road Interbasin Project, which is intended to stop invasive carp from entering the Great Lakes

In 2025, we urge the Army Corps of Engineers to:

  • Continue implementing the first phase of construction at the Brandon Road Interbasin Project
  • Initiate planning, design, and engineering for the second increment of construction so that it can be completed in time for the second increment to follow seamlessly when the first increment is complete

Download the invasive species fact sheet.

Join Us February 20

Join the webinar to learn more about these critical issues. You’ll hear from members of our team who presented our federal priorities to members of Congress in meetings at the Capitol.

Register for the Webinar

The post How Washington Can Support the Great Lakes in 2025 appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2025/01/how-washington-can-support-the-great-lakes-in-2025/

Judy Freed

Congress – on a bipartisan vote – passed legislation late last week that continues strong momentum to stop invasive carp from reaching Lake Michigan.

Invasive carp pose serious economic and ecological threats to the Great Lakes. Silver and bighead carp have already wreaked havoc on the Mississippi and Illinois rivers, out-competing native fish for food and injuring people who recreate on the rivers. We must stop these invasive fish from moving any closer to Lake Michigan.

Funding supports carp prevention project

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will soon start building a critical project to stop invasive carp from reaching Lake Michigan. The Corps will install a series of barriers at the Brandon Road Lock and Dam near Joliet, Illinois, a chokepoint in waterways leading to Lake Michigan.

In the bill just passed, Congress increased the federal cost-share – which is how much the federal government will chip in – to 90% for the project’s annual operations and maintenance. This commitment shows that Congress and the Administration recognize that the invasive carp pose a significant threat to the entire Great Lakes region.

By increasing the federal cost-share to 90%, Congress has helped ensure that we keep moving with urgency to protect the Great Lakes from invasive carp.

Construction of carp barriers set to begin

The Brandon Road project – a series of barriers on the Des Plaines River to stop silver and bighead carp from reaching the Great Lakes – is now set to begin construction. Site preparation and riverbed rock removal will begin at Brandon Road in January.

“Thank you to all the Great Lake advocates, members of Congress, and state and local officials who are working to keep invasive carp out of our lakes,” says Molly Flanagan, Chief Operating Officer, Alliance for the Great Lakes. “We look forward to seeing shovels in the ground at Brandon Road early next year.”

More about Invasive Carp

Read more about the invasive carp approaching Lake Michigan and the Brandon Road project designed to stop them.

Read More

The post Congress Continues Momentum to Stop Invasive Carp appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/12/congress-continues-momentum-to-stop-invasive-carp/

Judy Freed

A woman engages a child in a Great Lakes activity.

You can find them across the Great Lakes region: at conferences, zoos, boat shows, farmer’s markets, swim races, film festivals, Earth Day events, and more.

Volunteer Alliance Ambassadors are out in their communities, growing people’s connections with the Great Lakes.

“The Great Lakes region is huge,” says Volunteer Engagement Manager Olivia Reda, “and our staff can’t be everywhere at once. Alliance Ambassadors are vital in helping us spread the word about how people can help protect the Great Lakes.”

Two women stand behind a table filled with Great Lakes maps and papers.

These dedicated volunteers hail from all 8 Great Lakes states. They join virtual meetings where they learn from experts about topics like plastic pollution, invasive species, and clean drinking water. They receive training in skills like public speaking and tabling. Then they represent the Alliance for the Great Lakes at events across the region.

This year, Ambassadors spoke and tabled at 51 events from Wisconsin to New York. They connected with families, businesses, student groups, and community organizations. They spoke at Adopt-a-Beach cleanups and welcomed guests at the Alliance’s Great Blue Benefit.

Ambassadors went online as well, learning and taking action to protect the Great Lakes. They shared information with their networks, contacted their legislators, attended webinars, and joined exclusive Ambassador conversations on topics like agricultural pollution, lead service line replacement, and climate change and the Great Lakes.

“I can’t thank them enough,” says Reda. “Our Ambassadors are such an integral part of our work and impact at Alliance for the Great Lakes. I am so grateful for everything they have done this year to help protect the Great Lakes and raise awareness about the threats our waters face!”

Join the Alliance Ambassadors

Are you passionate about protecting the Great Lakes and the people that rely on them? If so, consider becoming a volunteer Alliance Ambassador!

Learn More

The post Alliance Ambassadors Grow Community Connections with the Great Lakes appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/12/alliance-ambassadors-grow-community-connections-with-the-great-lakes/

Judy Freed

Joel Brammeier headshot.
Joel Brammeier, ​President & CEO

I firmly believe in the power of the long view. Great Lakes problems often result from years of accumulated neglect and bad decisions. Righting the ship requires years of patience and steady work until — one day — the breakthrough happens.

Thanks to your support, 2024 has been a year of breakthroughs for the Great Lakes and the people who rely on them. Some of the year’s most important achievements include:

Blocking Invasive Species. As a result of more than a decade of advocacy, construction will begin in 2025 on barriers to stop invasive carp from entering the Great Lakes as they advance from the Mississippi River watershed. This project at the Brandon Road Lock & Dam in Illinois will be the most effective deterrent to keep the invasive carp from wreaking havoc on the ecosystem and economic health of the Great Lakes.

Keeping Plastic Out of Our Waters. Adopt-a-Beach volunteers collected a milestone 10 millionth piece of litter this year. This amazing accomplishment spanned more than 200,000 volunteers who cleaned up their shorelines over 20+ years. In April, we released a groundbreaking report based on the data these volunteers collected. The report, which found that the vast majority of litter we collect is plastic, gained national media attention and has strengthened national and state-level efforts to reduce the scourge of Great Lakes plastic pollution.

Getting Lead Out of Drinking Water. In October, the EPA finalized new standards that require most water utilities in the Great Lakes to replace harmful lead pipes within 10 years. The agency significantly tightened longer timelines for Cleveland and Chicago, two Great Lakes cities with hundreds of thousands of lead lines to replace. EPA also reduced the allowable levels of lead in drinking water, above which water systems need to take additional protective steps.

Fighting Toxic Algae Blooms. In October, we finished deploying the most significant agriculture pollution monitoring network in the region in southeast Michigan’s Lake Erie watershed. Measuring and studying the agricultural runoff that causes toxic Lake Erie algal blooms will improve targeting of conservation practices in Michigan to address the issue.

Expanding the Clean Water Circle. We’re working to ensure state and federal infrastructure funding doesn’t bypass communities that bear an unfair burden of failing water systems. 200+ members have joined our forum, which provides information and training to bring funds to communities in critical need of safe drinking water and protection from flooding and sewage overflows.

None of these breakthroughs would have been possible without our supporters. Whether you were one of the volunteers who removed more than 573,000 pieces of litter from Great Lakes shorelines; one of the advocates who sent more than 16,000 messages to federal, state, and local decision-makers; or one of the donors who gave generously to protect our waters, your contribution made a real difference for the lakes this year.

Thank you for making 2024 a year of breakthroughs for the Great Lakes and clean water. Your support is invaluable in ensuring that our Great Lakes remain a thriving, vital resource for all. We’re ready to keep up the momentum in 2025.

Keep the Breakthroughs Coming

Donate today to protect fresh, clean, and safe water, and support our work to preserve our Great Lakes. 

Give a Gift Today

The post Breakthroughs for the Great Lakes appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/12/breakthroughs-for-the-great-lakes/

Judy Freed

Thanks to our amazing volunteers, Adopt-a-Beach celebrated three big firsts in 2025.

Adopt-a-Beach on your phone

This spring, our beach cleanup program launched a new system that allows volunteers to tally litter data on their phones.

“Adopt-a-Beach volunteers helped shape this project from start to finish,” says Olivia Reda, Volunteer Engagement Manager. “Volunteers asked for a way to tally litter data on their phones. They gave us feedback as the system was being developed. A small group of volunteers tested out the system last year. And volunteers are still helping improve it with their responses to a recent survey.”

The new system provides many benefits for Adopt-a-Beach volunteers. “It saves waste to use your phone instead of paper forms,” says Reda, “and you don’t have to deal with the wind blowing away your paper.” Volunteers get instant feedback on how many pieces of litter they’ve picked up without having to count hash marks on paper forms. Team Leaders – especially leaders of large cleanups – “save a lot of time” using phones for check-in and data collection. “It’s a smoother process overall,” says Reda. “Team Leaders spend less time on logistics, so there’s more time for them to educate and advocate at their cleanups.”

 “It’s great to see how ideas from our volunteers improve Adopt-a-Beach for everyone!” says Reda.

10 million pieces of litter

Tallying litter year after year helped reveal an amazing accomplishment. Volunteers have removed more than 10 million pieces of litter from the five Great Lakes’ shorelines since Adopt-a-Beach started tracking litter data in 2003.

Keeping 10 million pieces of litter out of our lakes is no small feat. And Adopt-a-Beach volunteers have done even more. The data they’ve collected show litter patterns, raise awareness about plastic pollution, and help pass policies to reduce plastic pollution and litter.

“One of the things I love about Adopt-a-Beach is how long our volunteers’ work lasts,” says Reda. “On the days of their cleanups, volunteers keep plastic and other trash out of the Great Lakes. People who see the cleanups are often inspired to do cleanups of their own weeks or months later. And the litter data our volunteers collect becomes part of a 20-plus year dataset that’s helping communities find solutions to plastic pollution.”

A groundbreaking report

In April, the Alliance released a groundbreaking report based on the dataset volunteers have collected. The report, which found that the vast majority of litter volunteers collect is plastic, gained national media attention and has strengthened national and state-level efforts to reduce the scourge of Great Lakes plastic pollution.

“Thanks to Adopt-a-Beach volunteers, we know that 86% of shoreline litter is plastic,” says Reda, who authored the report. “40% is in the ‘tiny trash’ category. Much of the plastic comes from single-use items.”

Plastic pollution threatens human health and the environment. The report outlines solutions that include businesses, governments, and manufacturers.

Thanks to volunteers’ work, momentum is building to reduce plastic pollution. You can read about some recent wins in the fight against plastic pollution here.

The numbers for 2024

Thank you to all the Adopt-a-Beach Team Leaders and volunteers who cared for their shorelines this year! Here are some highlights of what they accomplished in 2024: 

573,608 pieces of litter.
Litter Type: 37% tiny trash. 26% food-related. 19% smoking-related. 18% other.
11,324 volunteers.
23,560 pounds of litter.
Litter Material: 79% plastic. 21% other materials.
28,312 volunteer hours.

A special thanks to this year’s top Adopt-a-Beach sponsors: Dr. Scholl Foundation, Freudenberg, HSBC, Meijer, and Unilever.

The post 3 Big Firsts for Adopt-a-Beach appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/12/3-big-firsts-for-adopt-a-beach/

Judy Freed

Chicago, IL (December 4, 2024) – Today, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island District, announced they had awarded the first construction contract for the Brandon Road Interbasin Project on November 27. The Brandon Road project is a partnership between USACE and the States of Illinois and Michigan that is designed to prevent invasive carp from getting into the Great Lakes. The barrier is a major priority for the Alliance for the Great Lakes, which hailed the construction announcement:  

“By moving ahead with construction in a timely manner, the Army Corp of Engineers and the states of Illinois and Michigan clearly recognize the threat invasive carp pose to the Great Lakes,” said Molly Flanagan, Alliance for the Great Lakes Chief Operating Officer and Vice President for Programs. “The Alliance appreciates their continued dedication to stopping invasive carp from wreaking havoc on the Great Lakes.” 

Using the Illinois River and other waterways to expand their territory, invasive carp pose a significant threat to the ecological and economic health of Lake Michigan and the other Great Lakes. Invasive carp have already wreaked havoc on the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers. They cause serious damage to native fish populations because they out-compete other fish for food. Silver carp jump into the air when startled, posing the risk of serious injury to people and making infested waters off-limits to boating. Great Lakes communities and industries would be deeply harmed if invasive carp get into the Great Lakes and their tributaries and inland lakes. The Brandon Road Lock and Dam was identified as the crucial pinch point where layered technologies could be used to stop invasive carp populations from moving into the Great Lakes.

The Alliance for the Great Lakes has helped conceptualize the project and pushed at the state and federal levels to secure funding, complete engineering work, and keep the project moving forward. Advocates at the Alliance have been pushing for the project since the early 2000s.

###

Contact: Don Carr, Media Director, Alliance for the Great Lakes, dcarr@greatlakes.org

More about Invasive Carp

Read more about the invasive carp approaching Lake Michigan and the Brandon Road project designed to stop them.

Read More

The post Construction to Begin on Brandon Road Invasive Carp Barrier appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/12/construction-to-begin-on-brandon-road-invasive-carp-barrier/

Judy Freed

Lansing, Michigan (October 24, 2024) – A critical milestone in the fight against algal blooms on Lake Erie was reached as the installation of water quality monitoring equipment in five critical sub-watersheds feeding into the lake’s western basin was finalized. The monitoring network has started collecting data and is now the most comprehensive monitoring network in these sub-watersheds with a goal of better understanding headwater water quality and flow trends.

Rows of sensor parts.
Sensor assembly. Photo courtesy of LimnoTech/Freeboard Technology.
A group of boxes on legs.
Phosphorous monitoring equipment: Continuous online soluble reactive phosphorus and automated ISCO. Photo courtesy of LimnoTech/Freeboard Technology.

Lake Erie’s bloom is a persistent threat to human health and the local economy while also driving up drinking water costs. Blooms are fueled largely by nutrient runoff. In the Western Lake Erie Basin, agricultural land is the primary source for nonpoint nutrient pollution. To prevent blooms from damaging our economy and the environment, it’s critical to reduce the amount of nutrients entering rivers and streams in the WLEB. 

The new monitoring network was made possible thanks to Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s bipartisan budget, which provided the funding for a $4.86 million grant from the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (MDARD), and a $600,000 grant from the Erb Family Foundation. 

The Alliance for the Great Lakes is working in partnership with MDARD to increase the department’s ability to track and monitor water quality in five of Michigan’s priority sub-watersheds in the WLEB. Technical assistance is being provided by the Michigan State University’s Institute of Water Research, LimnoTech and Freeboard Technology. The project runs through 2029, and continuous data will be available throughout the monitoring effort’s lifetime.

A worker wades into the water to install equipment.
Installation of Turbidity Sensors near Adrian, Michigan. Photo courtesy of LimnoTech/Freeboard Technology.
Instrumentation along a waterway.
Instrumentation installed near Adrian, MI measuring soluble reactive phosphorus, total phosphorus, flow, conductivity, turbidity, weather, and soil conditions. Photo courtesy of LimnoTech/Freeboard Technology.

One approach to fight algal blooms has been to spend government funds at both the state and federal levels on farm-level conservation practices. Despite years of work and hundreds of millions in taxpayer funds spent, that approach has largely failed. Alliance for the Great Lakes research shows that farm conservation measures in Ohio and Michigan are woefully underfunded and, despite years of investment, adoption rates of conservation practices are still far behind where they need to be. Given the magnitude of the problem and the inadequate funding, states must prioritize and target funding to the highest priority areas and the most cost-efficient practices.  

“Water quality data indicate a lack of progress on achieving appreciable reductions of nutrient losses from agricultural sources. Progress moving forward is going to take a change in approach, a commitment to research, investments in monitoring, and enhanced expertise on the ground,” said Dr. Tim Boring, MDARD Director. The improved monitoring is essential to better understand the local hydrology, transport mechanisms, and the impacts of agronomic practices. Functioning alongside new research into areas such as soil health, this monitoring data informs necessary changes in targeting and incentivization approaches.  

Boring added that achieving improved environmental outcomes is a core mission area of MDARD’s new Regenerative Agriculture program. The program aims to deliver greater farm prosperity, improved farm ecosystems, increased community health, and a more vibrant food system. This ambitious approach is focused on realizing more definitive outcomes, including water quality.  

“Understanding, tracking, and predicting where nutrient pollution comes from is difficult due to weather, cropping complexities, and a lack of data. This makes properly targeting conservation funding complicated,” said Tom Zimnicki, Alliance for the Great Lakes’ Agriculture and Restoration Policy Director. 

“Understanding how nutrient pollution and water moves through the watershed will equip agencies and practitioners with accurate data to better target conservation and land management practices to improve water quality outcomes. We applaud the leadership of MDARD Director Boring who has continually emphasized the importance of expanding monitoring and data collection to help guide conservation decision-making.”

A map shows monitoring locations.
Monitoring locations: New sampling locations under this project are depicted with red and yellow circles.  
A chart showing real-time results from October 12-15, 2024.
Real-time sampling results.

### 

Contact: Don Carr, Media Director, Alliance for the Great Lakes dcarr@greatlakes.org

The post Monitoring Milestone in Fight Against Lake Erie Pollution appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/10/monitoring-milestone-in-fight-against-lake-erie-pollution/

Judy Freed

Chicago, IL (October 8, 2024) – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a final rule today requiring that water utilities across the country replace harmful lead pipes. The Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LCRI) address the widespread use of dangerous lead pipes for American drinking water and take decisive action by requiring replacement of lead service lines, after past rules left too much harmful lead in place. The Great Lakes region contains by far the greatest number of lead service lines of any region in the country, so has borne an especially heavy burden from this toxic legacy that still endures. The region thus stands to enjoy billions of dollars in health and economic benefits from removal of lead service lines.

The final rule, announced by President Joe Biden today in Wisconsin, will require drinking water systems nationwide to replace lead service lines within 10 years, with limited exceptions for water systems with the most lead lines, such as Cleveland and Chicago. Under one alternative that the EPA proposed, Chicago would have gotten as long as 50 years to replace its lead service lines. The final rule announced today substantially shortens the exceptions for systems like Chicago and Cleveland, responding to the call from the Alliance for the Great Lakes and other advocates that the rule must not leave vulnerable residents behind for decades more. The rule also requires more rigorous testing of drinking water and strengthens the threshold requiring communities to take action to protect people from lead exposure in water.

While the announcement also highlights that EPA is investing an additional $2.6 billion for drinking water upgrades and lead pipe replacements, funded by President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, billions more in federal funding will be needed to get the job done.

“Addressing lead service lines once and for all will bring huge benefits to the region by reducing negative impacts to childhood development and improving cardiac health, while creating thousands of jobs to get the lead out. President Biden and the EPA should be commended for this final rule,” said Meleah Geertsma, Director of Clean Water and Equity at the Alliance for the Great Lakes. “Now it’s up to Congress to provide the necessary funding to remove lead pipes once and for all, and water systems and states to ensure that community members most vulnerable to lead in drinking water are first in line to get their lead pipes replaced.”  

###

Contact: Don Carr, Media Director, Alliance for the Great Lakes dcarr@greatlakes.org

The post EPA Finalizes Clean Drinking Water Rule That Will Get the Lead Out of Great Lakes Drinking Water appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/10/epa-finalizes-clean-drinking-water-rule-that-will-get-the-lead-out-of-great-lakes-drinking-water/

Judy Freed

Chicago, IL (September 24, 2024) – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) final rule regulating ballast water was signed on September 20th. The EPA’s final rule does not protect the Great Lakes from the threat of invasive species spreading.

The EPA’s rule is problematic because it exempts existing “Lakers” (vessels that do not leave the Great Lakes) from regulation, and the ballast water discharged from these ships accounts for over 95 percent of ballast water volumes transferred in the Great Lakes. Studies show that Lakers are a contributor to the spread of destructive invasive species in the lakes. EPA intends to regulate any new Lakers constructed after 2026.  These regulations are much less protective than those adopted by Canada which require all ships to have ballast water treatment systems installed and operating by 2030, including Lakers.

Invasive species are significant and immediate threats to the ecosystems and economies of the Great Lakes Basin. In 2018, Congress directed the Environmental Protection Agency through the Vessel Incidental Discharge Act (VIDA) to establish national standards for vessel discharges to protect the natural environment and the surrounding communities from the introduction and transfer of harmful aquatic invasive species or pathogens through the discharge of ballast water.

The following environmental groups find that EPA’s final VIDA rule does not protect the Great Lakes from aquatic invasive species:

“Exempting any Lakers from regulations is the wrong approach to combat invasive species. The shipping industry has asked repeatedly for many years for uniform regulations for ballast water across the United States and that they be harmonized with Canada. This rule is the opposite of that,” said Molly M. Flanagan, Chief Operating Officer and Vice President for Programs at the Alliance for the Great Lakes. “Exempting existing Lakers carves out this class of ship from regulation and puts the Great Lakes at risk. Most important, it fails to live up to our obligation to prevent new damage from the invasive species that have already cost the Great Lakes, and the people that rely on them,” Flanagan added.

“Invasive species introduced through ballast water are a clear and present danger to our Great Lakes.  Unfortunately, the EPA standard will not adequately protect the Great Lakes and other U.S. waters from ballast water invaders,” said Marc Smith, Great Lakes Policy Director for National Wildlife Federation. “By exempting Lakers, the EPA fails to protect water quality and leaves the door open for future harm to our fisheries, economy and way of life.”

“Protecting the Great Lakes from invasive species and plants requires effective EPA standards for ballast water discharges from all Lakers. That includes existing Lakers, not just those built in the future,” said Wendy Bloom, Senior Attorney at the Environmental Law & Policy Center. “Unfortunately, the rule’s exemption for existing Lakers risks creating a permanent class of polluting vessels that will cause damage to our Great Lakes from invasive species for many years to come. Indeed, the EPA’s rule repeats the historic failure to apply fair regulatory standards to old highly-polluting coal plants, which have kept running for years harming our environment and public health. The public and the Great Lakes deserve better.”

“Minnesotans are deeply concerned about the Laker exemption. Duluth-Superior is North America’s largest inland port and receives about 85 percent of the ballast water discharges in the Great Lakes system,” said Steve Morse, Executive Director of the Minnesota Environmental Partnership. “Over the last forty years, many harmful aquatic invasive species have come to the Duluth Harbor in ballast water. This exemption will allow existing Lakers to continue to dump untreated ballast water from other Great Lakes ports into the Duluth-Superior harbor for decades to come. The impact of this is significant. People in Duluth hope to feed their families with a walleye and instead catch the undesirable invasive ruffe. A new invader, the bloody red shrimp, arrived in Duluth in 2018 from another Great Lakes port. Every Laker that comes into port could be carrying the next invader. This is a form of Russian Roulette that none of us want to play.”

###

Contact:

Don Carr, Media Director, Alliance for the Great Lakes dcarr@greatlakes.org

Anna Marie Zorn, Great Lakes Communications Manager, National Wildlife Federation, ZornA@nwf.org

Judith Nemes, Environmental Law & Policy Center Senior Media Relations Specialist, jnemes@elpc.org

Keeping Invasive Species Out of the Great Lakes

Once invasive species are established in the Great Lakes, it is nearly impossible to remove them. Preventing them from ever entering is the best way to protect the Great Lakes.

Learn More

The post EPA Vessel Discharge Rule Once Again Fails to Protect the Great Lakes appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/09/epa-vessel-discharge-rule-once-again-fails-to-protect-the-great-lakes/

Judy Freed

Today, clean water advocates spoke out in support of Ohio’s Lead Line Replacement Act (HB 534), a bill designed to get the lead out of Ohio’s drinking water systems by eliminating lead water service lines within 15 years. The bill, introduced by Ohio State Rep. Dontavius Jarrells, includes key provisions that support workforce development and ensure low- and moderate-income customers will not be burdened by the cost of replacement.

Lead exposure from consuming contaminated water can cause irreversible brain damage in children that may take years to emerge. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention has determined there is no safe level of lead in children. Ohio currently ranks third in the nation for the most lead pipes serving families.

Meleah Geertsma, Director of Clean Water & Equity at the Alliance for the Great Lakes, spoke in support of the bill at today’s press conference in Columbus, Ohio. Her remarks are below.

A video screen grab shows Meleah Geertsma speaking at a press conference.
Meleah Geertsma, Director of Clean Water & Equity, speaks at a press conference about Ohio’s Lead Line Replacement Act.

My name is Meleah Geertsma, and I am the Director of Clean Water and Equity at the Alliance for the Great Lakes. The Alliance is a regional organization committed to protecting the health of the Great Lakes and the people and communities that depend on them.

I’m honored to be here today to support Representative Jarrells on this critical infrastructure and public health measure.

My son was born 10 years ago – just a few months after Flint, Michigan, switched its source water and triggered a crisis that would drive a national reckoning with lead in our drinking water.

At the time, I was working at a national organization and I focused largely on air pollution. I also worked with people directly involved in Flint and started doing water work myself.

From that vantage, I saw the harm being done to Flint and other communities like it. I also dug deep into the science and data behind lead in drinking water, learning how we’d failed as a country to adequately test for and control lead.

From my public health training, I already knew that there is no “safe” level of lead exposure. The arrival of my son, however, elevated the issue from a place of professional concern to personal and parental anxiety.

I learned that lead levels in drinking water can vary hugely from minute to minute and day to day and house to house even within the same water system. So having a “passing” test on one day from a few houses in the system is no guarantee that the system’s water is safe for all consumers.

And I learned that on the whole, Great Lakes water systems hover just below the older, inadequate federal action level – meaning that they have significant amounts of harmful lead in their water.

In sum, I confirmed that the only way to truly protect people from lead is to remove it completely from the system.

At the time, I took some comfort because I also learned that it was unlikely our large condo building where my son spent his first critical three years had a lead service line – because the metal is too soft for larger lines serving larger buildings.

So I was able to make his formula without fearing that I was inadvertently harming him by mixing the powder with our home’s water.

My son turned three in 2017 – while I was working on a bill in Illinois that would require replacement of all lead service lines, like the bill we’re here to support today.

That summer, we bought our first house in an inner suburb of Chicago. It was 100 years old and had been owned by the same family for 60 years – with minimal updates. And it had a lead service line.

From the day we moved in, I worried that our drinking water would hurt our son. We replaced all the faucets and added an under-sink filter to the kitchen, and made sure to get our son tested for lead regularly and monitored his development. And every time he threw a tantrum or fell behind in school, I worried it was the water – and our fault.

We’re lucky and privileged – we live in a community with a relatively well-funded and capable water department. We knew to take protective measures and to closely monitor our son, and we had financial resources and specialists available. Today, our son is okay, with no visible impacts of lead.

But not everyone has the resources or the information that we did – nor should people have to rely solely on their own resources to protect themselves and their families against a public health emergency that arises from water infrastructure, or worry that their child will be poisoned when visiting a friend’s or family member’s home.

While I know from personal experience the guilt and helplessness a parent can feel when struggling to protect their child, I also know that access to clean water is a fundamental right that can only be secured if we demand change and work together to solve the problem.

Flint happened 10 years ago – that’s a full decade. The time to get the lead out is long past. As my son would say “Let’s Go!”

Getting the Lead Out

Learn more about efforts to replace lead pipes and improve water infrastructure across the Great Lakes.

Learn More

The post Supporting Legislation to Remove Lead Water Pipes in Ohio appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/09/supporting-legislation-to-remove-lead-water-pipes-in-ohio/

Judy Freed

10 million pieces of litter kept out of the Great Lakes.

Chicago, IL (September 4, 2024) – Today, the Alliance for the Great Lakes announced an Adopt-a-Beach milestone. In the twenty-one years the Alliance has been tracking trash collected by the organization’s dedicated volunteers, more than 10 million pieces of litter have been removed from the five Great Lakes’ shorelines.  

“Our terrific volunteers do the incredibly hard work of not only cleaning the beaches but also take the time to catalog what they find. It may surprise people that instead of finding large items like bikes and tires, it’s mostly smaller bits of plastic trash. Their findings show litter patterns, raise awareness about plastic pollution, and help pass policies to reduce plastic pollution and litter,” said Olivia Reda, Alliance for the Great Lakes Volunteer Engagement Manager. 

In April, the Alliance released for the first time 20 years of data collected by Adopt-a-Beach volunteers that show 86% of the trash was either fully or partially made from plastic. Single-use plastic breaks down into much smaller pieces — microplastics — which have been found in our drinking water, fish, and even in human tissue. The building blocks of plastic are toxic and use large amounts of fossil fuels in their production.  

“I am consistently humbled and inspired by the hard work Alliance Adopt-a-Beach volunteers do, using their precious free time to clean up the region’s beaches. Plastic producers should give our volunteers a break by taking responsibility for the pollution they produce,” said Joel Brammeier, Alliance for the Great Lakes President and CEO.  

There is serious momentum across the country to steer the burden of plastic pollution away from consumers by holding producers accountable for the plastics that choke beaches and lakes, The Alliance for the Great Lakes has called for implementing extended producer responsibility policies — holding producers responsible across the life cycle of their products and packaging, from design and materials to end-of-life management. 

In August, Illinois Governor Pritzker signed a bill into law to eliminate the use of small, single-use plastic bottles containing personal care products in hotels. Minnesota became the fifth state in the U.S. to establish extended producer responsibility legislation for packaging, joining the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec, which have been implementing policies holding producers accountable for years. In the United States, extended producer responsibility laws have passed in Maine, California, Oregon and Colorado. 

The Biden Administration announced in July that the federal government would phase out its purchases of single-use plastics since it is the biggest buyer of consumer goods in the world. At the Federal level, the Alliance is supporting the Plastic Pellet Free Waters Act, the Farewell to Foam Act, and the Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act.  

If you would like to volunteer to join an Alliance for the Great Lakes Adopt-a-Beach cleanup event, please follow this link: https://adopt.greatlakes.org/s/

###

If you are a member of the media and would like more information about covering an Adopt-a-Beach cleanup event, please contact Don Carr at dcarr@greatlakes.org.

The post 10 Million Pieces of Litter Collected from Great Lakes Shorelines appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/09/10-million-pieces-of-litter-collected-from-great-lakes-shorelines/

Judy Freed

Molly Flannagan headshot.
Molly Flanagan, Chief Operating Officer & Vice President for Programs

On August 5th, the New York Times opinion section published a piece by Arizona State University professor Dr. Jay Famiglietti where he asked Will We Have to Pump the Great Lakes to California to Feed the Nation?

At the Alliance for the Great Lakes, we are compelled to remind those eyeing Great Lakes water that Famiglietti poses a question already answered. No, we can’t pump water from the Great Lakes to California because it would violate federal and state law, specifically the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact that prohibits such acts.  

Even if the impossible was possible – far better common-sense strategies than building expensive, thousand-mile-long water pipelines exist, like engaging in proven conservation, water reuse, and land-use planning initiatives. Only 1% of the water in the Great Lakes is renewed each year, underscoring the hard choices and complex planning that goes into keeping sustainable amounts of water available.  

Short-sighted Western water law, rampant unchecked growth, and poor agricultural policy is much to blame for Western water shortages. The idea of building a massive, large-scale public works project to move water from one area of the country to another – which the author acknowledges would be wasteful and environmentally harmful – may be easier for some to envision than having difficult conversations about sustainable water and land use management.  

Western water users would be better served working together to manage and plan for sustainable water use, like the eight Great Lakes states did, than embracing pipeline-in-the-sky fantasies made impossible by a settled agreement between the U.S. federal government, the Canadian provinces of Quebec and Ontario, and eight states.  

Learn about the Great Lakes Compact

Learn more about the Great Lakes Compact and how it protects Great Lakes water.

Read More

The post Great Lakes Water is Staying in the Great Lakes appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/08/great-lakes-water-is-staying-in-the-great-lakes/

Judy Freed

Chicago, IL (August 12, 2024) – On Friday, Governor Pritzker signed the Small Single-Use Plastic Bottle Act (SB2960) into law, which requires hotels with 50 or more rooms to eliminate the use of small, single-use plastic bottles containing personal care products in individual rooms and public bathrooms beginning July 1, 2025. By Jan. 1, 2026, all hotels are expected to make this transition. This law encourages the use of innovative reusable solutions while reducing the amount of plastic waste in our lakes – the source of drinking water for 40 million people – and serves as a model for the Great Lakes region to follow. 

“I commend Governor Pritzker, Senator Fine, and the Illinois Legislature for their leadership in addressing the growing problem of single-use plastic,” said Andrea Densham, Senior Policy Advisor for the Alliance for the Great Lakes. “This new Illinois law is a big step in the right direction, driving innovation and reducing single-use plastics. We must keep advancing stronger laws to reduce plastic production, fix the broken recycling system, move manufacturers and retailers toward using less unnecessary plastic, and shift to reusable alternatives. Now is the time to take the next step by requiring that all washing machines filter out microfibers and banning the use of polystyrene foam containers that pollute our waterways.” 

“The Small Single-Use Plastic Bottle Act is exactly what we mean when we say we need upstream solutions. Plastic pollution that ends up in our rivers and the Great Lakes ultimately feed into the ocean. With tens of millions of visitors staying in Illinois hotels every year, this bill will significantly reduce plastic production and pollution. We are glad to see Illinois take this critical step and hope that other states will follow suit,” said Ocean Conservancy’s Vice President of External Affairs, Jeff Watters, an Illinois native. 

“This new law is a success story of how policy advocacy takes individual action to the next level,” Illinois Environmental Council Executive Director Jen Walling said. “We have such a strong and growing community of concerned Illinoisans who are increasingly recognizing the single-use plastic crisis we’re facing. When they raise their voices and contact their lawmakers, our collective advocacy can drive policy change to tackle plastic pollution at scale.” 

“Illinois is a national leader in protecting the environment,” said State Sen. Laura Fine. “With this new law, the hotel industry will join our efforts. By reducing their footprint and opting for more economical and environmentally-friendly toiletry options, Illinois’ hotel industry will keep thousands of pounds of plastic out of our landfills and waterways over the years.” 

“The advocates from the Illinois Environmental Council and their members were great partners in this work to reduce single-use plastic pollution in our communities this past session,” said State Rep. Kam Buckner. “Today, Illinois takes another step toward protecting people and our environment from the growing dangers associated with single-use and microplastic pollution. I’m excited to continue this critical work together.” 

Unrecyclable, single-use plastics are choking the environment. More than 22 million pounds of plastic pollution end up in the Great Lakes every year, and these plastics never fully biodegrade. Instead, they break down into smaller and smaller pieces known as “microplastics.” 

Researchers have found stunningly high amounts of these microplastics in all five Great Lakes, which provide drinking water for 40 million people. They’ve found microplastics in Great Lakes fish, drinking water, bottled water, and beer, posing potential threats to human health. 

By targeting unnecessary single-use plastics, SB2960 would have ripple effects across multiple sectors, such as reducing the purchase of single-use products, encouraging reusable solutions and sparking business innovation, and preventing costly, unrecyclable plastic waste from filling up local municipal waste systems – where taxpayers bear the burden. These actions also protect our Great Lakes, water, and environment, all at the same time.   

The Illinois legislature is also considering several other bills to address plastic pollution, such as legislation that would prevent microplastic pollution with washing machine filters and banning foam foodware.

###

Contact:

Don Carr, Media Director, Alliance for the Great Lakes, dcarr@greatlakes.org

Roya Fox, Senior Communications Manager, Ocean Conservancy, rfox@oceanconservancy.org

Hannah Flath, Illinois Environmental Council, hannah@ilenviro.org

The post Illinois First Great Lakes State to Reduce Single-Use Plastic Bottles in Hotels appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/08/illinois-first-great-lakes-state-to-reduce-single-use-plastic-bottles-in-hotels/

Judy Freed

As the 2024 election season ramps up, voters are getting ready to cast their ballots. They’re researching candidate platforms, attending events, asking tough questions of candidates, and talking with family, neighbors, and friends about the election.

The 2024 Election Season & the Great Lakes: How to Get Involved.

While the presidential election is driving much of the election-year conversation, every office on the ballot, from mayors to the president of the United States, will have the opportunity to influence the Great Lakes and water issues once in office.

We need laws and policies that protect and restore the Great Lakes. We must keep pushing for stronger, better safeguards for the world’s largest source of surface freshwater. And we must ensure that everyone in the Great Lakes region has access to clean, safe, and affordable drinking water, and is safe from community flooding, basement backups, and sewage overflows.

Download our nonpartisan 2024 Voter Toolkit and learn how to make a difference this election season.

Make the Great Lakes and clean water part of the election-year conversation

Right now, you have an opportunity to encourage candidates to stand up for the Great Lakes and hold them accountable once elected.

Your voice makes a difference – whether you’re asking questions at a candidate forum, chiming in on social media, speaking directly with a candidate, or highlighting water issues in a letter to the editor. People running for elected office pay attention to issues that bubble to the top in all these venues.

The toolkit will help you:

Vote and encourage others to vote

Voting is the most important way for you to have a voice in how elected officials protect our water.

The toolkit will help you:

You can also use our Great Lakes Voter Information Center to check your voter registration status, learn which candidates are on your ballot, find your polling place, and get information about early voting, absentee ballots, and more.

Make a difference for the Great Lakes this election season

Elections have a big impact on our Great Lakes and the communities that rely on them. Show candidates that you care about the lakes and clean water. Vote, and encourage others to vote.

Download the whole 2024 Voter Toolkit or get just the sections that would be most helpful.


The Alliance for the Great Lakes and the Election Season: Our Role
As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, the Alliance for the Great Lakes cannot support or oppose candidates or political parties. However, we can, and do, educate candidates and voters on Great Lakes issues.

The post The 2024 Election Season and the Great Lakes appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/08/the-2024-election-season-and-the-great-lakes/

Judy Freed

Tom Zimnicki headshot.
Tom Zimnicki, Agriculture & Restoration Policy Director

This August marks the 10-year anniversary of when residents of Toledo, Ohio awoke to urgent warnings not to drink or use their tap water. Half a million people were unable to drink their water, cook with it, or brush their teeth. The cause? Toxins from a harmful algal bloom growing in Lake Erie.

Fueled by nutrient pollution, largely from agriculture, and exacerbated by climate change, toxic algal blooms are a growing threat across America. Chronic blooms persist on Lake Erie and are now appearing on all Great Lakes – which contain 22% of the world’s supply of fresh surface water.

What can be done to stop the spread of toxic algal blooms?

One approach has been to spend government funds at both the state and federal levels on farm-level conservation practices. These initiatives aim to stem the deluge of nitrogen and phosphorous – the two main components of farm fertilizer that fuel blooms – from entering the lakes.

Despite years of work and hundreds of millions in taxpayer funds spent, that approach has largely failed. In 2015, the governors of Michigan and Ohio pledged to reduce phosphorus runoff to Lake Erie by 40% in ten years. It is widely understood by all parties with an interest in cleaning up algal blooms that we will not meet those reduction targets by a wide margin. Alliance for the Great Lakes research shows that farm conservation measures in Ohio and Michigan are woefully underfunded and that despite years of investment, adoption rates of conservation practices are still far behind where they need to be. The current approach – inadequate funding and not enough farms following best practices – is failing to protect our water.

Given the magnitude of the problem and the inadequate funding, states must prioritize and target funding to the highest priority fields and the most cost-efficient practices. In partnership with the engineers and scientists at LimnoTech, and with guidance from Michigan’s Department of Agriculture and Rural Development and Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, we’ve developed tools aimed at improving our ability to reduce phosphorus loads from five priority subwatersheds feeding Lake Erie and ultimately Michigan’s entire portion of the Western Lake Erie Basin.

Over the past two years, we developed a two-pronged approach to aid in nutrient reduction planning in Michigan. First, we created maps that help identify possible priority fields for conservation implementation based on field characteristics in a subset of Michigan’s portion of the Western Lake Erie Basin. These maps are not intended to definitively identify fields that are losing phosphorus. Their utility exists as a starting point for outreach efforts to the agriculture community. Second, the report lays out a methodology and rationale for targeting efforts in one area over another.

Traditionally, state and federal agencies have funded conservation implementation without prioritizing locations. By identifying fields that are most at risk of losing phosphorus, and by giving the state and agencies tools to prioritize outreach efforts, we aim to make a bigger impact using the limited funds available. Our analysis also identifies the cost and acres of conservation practices necessary to meet the phosphorus targets that Michigan and Ohio agreed to in 2015.

Understanding current water quality in the subwatersheds of the Western Lake Erie Basin is critical for making informed decisions on future conservation spending. Earlier this year the Alliance, in partnership with LimnoTech and Michigan State University’s Institute of Water Research, launched a five-year water quality monitoring effort in the headwaters of the Western Lake Erie Basin. This monitoring is funded through the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development ($4.86M) and the Erb Family Foundation ($600,000). The investment from the Department is its largest in water quality monitoring. Sensors will be deployed that will measure nutrient pollution in real time, and the results of this monitoring can be used to further understand where interventions can have the biggest impact in keeping water clean. While this work is focused in Michigan, we believe the methodology is transferable throughout the Great Lakes region.

We hope that state agencies can use this information to better prioritize how they spend their limited time and money. If an agency can start moving towards a more targeted approach to spending money, more of our water will be protected and states will move closer to meeting their existing commitments.

Downstream Water Users Bear Financial Burden of Upstream Pollution

Ohioans across the state are struggling to afford their water and sewer bills. Our 2022 study shows that water bills are pushed even higher for communities that pull their drinking water from Lake Erie due to harmful algal blooms caused by upstream agricultural pollution.

Read More

The post New Targeting Strategies to Fight Algal Blooms appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/07/new-targeting-strategies-to-fight-algal-blooms/

Judy Freed

Joel Brammeier headshot.
Joel Brammeier, ​President & CEO

I write today with big news. For more than a decade, we’ve been working with scientists, advocates, federal agencies, and elected officials to prevent invasive carp in the Mississippi River from entering Lake Michigan. I’m thrilled to let you know that the Brandon Road project – a series of barriers on the Des Plaines River to stop silver and bighead carp from reaching the Great Lakes – is now set to begin construction. This couldn’t have happened without you.

As of today, the state of Illinois and the state of Michigan signed a final project agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to get shovels in the ground as soon as January.

This project is a decade in the making and is a major priority for the Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Invasive silver and bighead carp have already wreaked havoc on the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers, out-competing native fish for food and injuring people who recreate on the rivers. By using a series of measures designed to stop the carp, the Brandon Road project will act as the choke point to stop them from reaching Lake Michigan. The fish threaten the economic health of the Great Lakes’ $7 billion commercial and sport fishing industry, its $16 billion recreational boating industry, and the entire Great Lakes ecosystem.

This historic agreement wouldn’t have happened without you. Thank you for advocating for the lakes, contacting your elected officials, supporting us with your donations, and being a part of the Alliance for the Great Lakes. Together, we’ve been leading efforts to stop invasive carp for more than a decade. We released a groundbreaking report, advocated before Congress, negotiated with industry and elected officials, informed feasibility studies, helped secure federal and state funding, and more. Through it all, we kept up the pressure.

I’d also like to thank Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker and Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer as well as U.S. Senators Dick Durbin and Debbie Stabenow and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for their leadership to make this project happen and ensure the Great Lakes are protected.

I hope you’ll join me in taking a moment to celebrate this historic win for the lakes.

Tell Congress: Keep Up the Momentum to Stop Invasive Carp

Invasive carp pose a serious threat to our Great Lakes. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is ready to start building a critical project to prevent them from reaching Lake Michigan.

Take Action

The post Historic Win for the Great Lakes: Invasive Carp Barrier Gets Final OK appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/07/historic-win-for-the-great-lakes-invasive-carp-barrier-gets-final-ok/

Judy Freed

Chicago, IL (July 1, 2024) – Today, a coalition of environmental, conservation, and advocacy groups celebrated the announcement that Illinois Governor Pritzker, Michigan Governor Whitmer and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Army Corps) signed a historic Project Partnership Agreement (PPA) to begin construction on the Brandon Road Project to keep invasive carp out of the Great Lakes.

The thousands of businesses that rely on the Great Lakes for their livelihoods owe Governor Pritzker and Governor Whitmer, and their staff, a debt of gratitude for this historic agreement. Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) also tirelessly worked to ensure the Brandon Road project moved forward and that the Great Lakes are protected. Appreciation for the agreement should also be shared with the Army Corp for shepherding the project through the planning and design stage, and the Biden Administration for providing significant funding for the first phase of construction through the Infrastructure and Investment Jobs Act.

Advocates, some of whom have been pushing for the project since the early 2000s, hailed the milestone agreement to keep invasive carp out of the Great Lakes.

“By signing the agreement, Governor Pritzker and Governor Witmer cemented their legacies as strong defenders of the Great Lakes. Invasive carp are poised to wreak havoc on Lake Michigan, and because of their actions, we now have the chance to stop them at Brandon Road,” said Molly Flanagan, Alliance for the Great Lakes Chief Operating Officer and Vice President for Programs.

“The signing of the Brandon Road Project Agreement is historic and will help protect our fishery, our economy and quality of life.” said Marc Smith, policy director with National Wildlife Federation. “Keeping invasive carp out of the Great Lakes is a national priority. We applaud Illinois Governor Pritzker for his leadership in working with Michigan Governor Whitmer, all the Great Lakes states, the U.S. Congress and the Biden Administration in finalizing this project.”

“The signing of this agreement to advance the Brandon Road Project marks a proud and historic day for Great Lakes communities,” said Mayor Leon Rockingham, Jr., Mayor of the City of North Chicago, IL and member of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative. “I commend Governor Pritzker and the Illinois Department of Natural Resources for leading the charge against the threat of invasive carp, securing the best possible financial arrangement for the State of Illinois, and protecting the blue economy on which our shoreline communities depend.”

“We commend Governors Pritzker and Whitmer for working together and with federal partners to advance the Brandon Road project to help keep invasive carp out of the Great Lakes and thereby avoid a potential ecological and economic disaster,” said Howard Learner, Executive Director at the Environmental Law & Policy Center.

“We applaud Governor Pritzker and the State of Illinois for reaching this critical agreement with the State of Michigan to protect our priceless shared asset, Lake Michigan,” said Jack Darin, Director of the Sierra Club, Illinois Chapter. “This agreement starts work on a major defense for Lake Michigan against invasive species, and we urge all parties to move as quickly as possible to protect our precious Great Lakes.”

“We are grateful to Governor Pritzker for continuing to exercise environmental leadership in prioritizing the long-term health and vitality of our most critical ecosystems and economic drivers like Lake Michigan,” said Jen Walling, executive director of the Illinois Environmental Council. “Together, we can protect the future of our Great Lakes for generations to come.”

###

Contact: Don Carr, Media Director, Alliance for the Great Lakes, dcarr@greatlakes.org

More about Invasive Carp

Read more about the invasive carp approaching Lake Michigan and the Brandon Road project designed to stop them.

Read More

The post Historic Agreement Signed to Keep Invasive Carp Out of the Great Lakes appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/07/historic-agreement-signed-to-keep-invasive-carp-out-of-the-great-lakes/

Judy Freed

Chicago, IL (June 11, 2024) – A diverse group of stakeholders from the conservation and environmental community, labor, and local government held a press conference today to discuss the invasive carp that are located less than 50 miles from Lake Michigan.

These ecosystem-destroying fish pose a severe threat to the economic health of the Great Lakes, specifically the region’s $7 billion commercial and sport fishing industry and its $16 billion recreational boating industry. For that reason, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has identified building additional structural measures at the Brandon Road Lock and Dam near Joliet, Illinois as the most feasible way to prevent the upstream migration of invasive carp.

The only remaining action required for Brandon Road project construction to begin is for the State of Illinois to sign the Project Partnership Agreement (PPA) with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The PPA must be agreed to by June 30th so that the project construction can take advantage of a planned lock closure in the river at Lockport Lock near Brandon Road and move forward to construction later this year.

In the press conference, stakeholders encouraged Illinois Governor Pritzker to cement his legacy as a strong champion of the Great Lakes by signing an agreement with the federal government to advance the Brandon Road project. This important step would unlock millions of dollars in federal investments, allowing construction to begin in early 2025, bringing good-paying jobs to Illinois, and preventing invasive carp from harming the Great Lakes’ ecological vitality and blue economy.

“Local 150 urges the Army Corps of Engineers and the State of Illinois to sign the Project Partnership Agreement as soon as possible. We stand ready to support this endeavor, and we are eager to see it progress to construction, bringing with it jobs, environmental protection, and a stronger future for our region,” said Kristine Kavanagh, Communications Director at International Union of Operating Engineers Local 150.

“Governor Pritzker should be commended for his steadfast support of the Brandon Road Project to date, including his work with Governor Whitmer of Michigan to secure a combined $114 million in state funding for the project’s construction phase,” said Mayor Billy McKinney of Zion, Illinois, a former chair of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative.

“By signing the Project Partnership Agreement by June 30, Governor Pritzker would be demonstrating both good stewardship of our freshwater resources and good stewardship of taxpayer dollars by avoiding any unnecessary cost increases,” Mayor McKinney added.

“We must stop the spread of destructive invasive carp before it is too late. By signing the PPA, Illinois Governor Pritzker has the opportunity to secure his legacy as not just a champion of the Great Lakes, but also a critical interstate partner with the state of Michigan,” said Jennifer Walling, Executive Director at the Illinois Environmental Council.

###

Contact: Don Carr, Media Director, Alliance for the Great Lakes, dcarr@greatlakes.org

More about Invasive Carp

Read more about the invasive carp approaching Lake Michigan and the Brandon Road project designed to stop them.

Read More

The post Illinois Must Act Now To Keep Invasive Carp out of the Great Lakes appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/06/illinois-must-act-now-to-keep-invasive-carp-out-of-the-great-lakes/

Judy Freed

A photo of Adopt-a-Beach volunteers surrounds ABC World News Tonight anchor Linsey Davis.

Adopt-a-Beach made a big splash in the media this spring, raising awareness about plastic pollution and solutions. And 20 years’ worth of Adopt-a-Beach volunteers were part of it.

“One of the things I love about Adopt-a-Beach is how long our volunteers’ work lasts,” said Olivia Reda, Volunteer Engagement Manager and author of the new report Adopt-a-Beach: 20 Years of Great Lakes Litter Data.

“On the days of their cleanups, volunteers keep plastic and other trash out of the Great Lakes. People who see the cleanups are often inspired to do cleanups of their own weeks or months later. And the litter data our volunteers collect becomes part of a 20-plus year dataset that’s helping communities find solutions to plastic pollution.”

Here are some of this spring’s Adopt-a-Beach stories from across the region:

“Thanks again to everyone who volunteers with Adopt-a-Beach,” said Reda. “I am so grateful for each and every action you’ve taken to help protect the Great Lakes!”

A special thanks to this year’s top Adopt-a-Beach sponsors: HSBC, Meijer, and Unilever.

The post Adopt-a-Beach Makes a Splash appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/05/adopt-a-beach-makes-a-splash/

Judy Freed

In 2010, Congress established the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) to allow the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), working in collaboration with other federal agencies, states, and tribes, to fund projects to restore and protect the Great Lakes. To date, the GLRI has funded more than 7,563 individual projects totaling $3.7 billion and has greatly improved the quality of life in the region. GLRI projects restore habitat, reduce non-point source pollution, prevent the establishment or spread of invasive species, and clean up toxic legacy pollution. In recognition of the importance of this program, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 invested an additional $1 billion to accelerate the cleanup of toxic legacy pollution at “Areas of Concern” throughout the region.

Will Congress extend the GLRI for 5 more years?

This year is another important year for the GLRI. Congress is considering bipartisan legislation to reauthorize and extend the program for an additional five years at $500 million per year from 2027-2031. A bipartisan group of lawmakers, including Senators Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) and J.D. Vance (R-OH) in the Senate, and Representatives David Joyce (R-OH), Debbie Dingell (D-MI), Bill Huizenga (R-MI) and Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) in the House, have introduced legislation to reauthorize the GLRI.

On May 1, 2024, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee unanimously approved the legislation thereby clearing the way for full Senate passage later this year. On the House side, the bill has 31 Republican and Democratic cosponsors, and we continue to advocate that the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee approve the bill and send it to the full House for approval.

How will projects be prioritized?

In addition to GLRI’s reauthorization, the Alliance for the Great Lakes worked in partnership with the Healing Our Waters–Great Lakes Coalition to suggest ways the EPA could improve its next GLRI Action Plan. The Action Plan is important because it identifies five-year priorities for GLRI funding. We encouraged EPA to address climate change resilience and to focus on the needs of underserved communities. We also made specific suggestions for each part of the Action Plan.

EPA adopted many of our recommendations in its recently released draft “Action Plan IV.” When complete, it will guide GLRI funding to projects from 2025 to 2029.  Climate change is now better incorporated into the draft action plan with projected climate change impacts being emphasized during the design and implementation of GLRI projects. There is increased focus on meaningfully involving underserved communities in decisions about addressing issues in their communities and accruing benefits from GLRI projects. We would still like to see additional emphasis in both areas consistent with our earlier comments.

How you can help

EPA would like your feedback on the draft Action Plan IV. You can read the action plan and provide comments to EPA until May 24, and we hope you will.

Give Your Feedback by May 24

EPA would like your feedback on the draft GLRI Action Plan IV. You can read the plan and provide comments to EPA until May 24, 2024.

Read the Plan & Give Your Feedback

The post 2024: An Important Year for Great Lakes Restoration appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/05/2024-an-important-year-for-great-lakes-restoration/

Judy Freed

Adopt-a-Beach volunteers and Alliance Ambassadors do so much for the Great Lakes! They organize beach cleanups. They spread the word about how people can protect the lakes. They build community around all five Great Lakes in eight Great Lakes states.

In honor of National Volunteer Month, we asked folks to send our volunteers a few words of appreciation. People across the region showed Great Lakes volunteers their love. Here are just some of the things they said:

“Your work and passion for the Lakes is so appreciated by all those who use and love our lakes! Your work is noticed and appreciated! Thank you!”

Anne S, Minnesota

“Thank you for giving of your time to care for this most amazing planet. Your service and care is most appreciated and a gift to us all.”

Jonathan H, Illinois

“THANK YOU!!  To all of the Team Leaders, Adopt-a-Beach Volunteers and Alliance Ambassadors who help to keep the beaches clean.  You all are the unsung heroes helping to protect the Great Lakes.”

Annette R, Ohio

“From Buffalo, NY, a Great (Lakes) Big Thank You!!”

Jennifer F, New York

“Thank you for your care of creation.”

Carole H, Ohio

“To everyone making a difference by volunteering, THANK YOU! The Great Lakes are a global treasure, and the work you do to improve and protect them while individually small, collectively makes a better planet earth.”

Jim Z, Wisconsin

“Thank you for your valuable time in helping us keep our beaches clean!”

John L, Pennsylvania

“I work at the Alliance, and I know you are the heart of our work! Thank you so much for the time and energy you devote to protecting the Great Lakes. Your work makes a difference every day. I’m grateful to you for your work and look forward to the progress we will make together over the next year.”

Molly F, Illinois

“Thank you for your time & energy to help keep the Great Lakes great. Grateful for you & thank you.”

Anita S, Michigan

“I grew up on Lake Erie, and have lived on Lake Ontario for my adult life.  We go frequently to Lake Huron and Georgian Bay.  Being able to live in this blessed triangle of Ontario is one of the best things in my life. This is why I am writing to thank all the volunteers who look after the lakes and their shores, whether through beach cleanups, or other means. You keep this beloved area safe, and allow it to survive into our challenging and uncertain future, as a refuge and a home for people and creatures of all kinds. Many many thanks from me and my family, and dear friends who are all Great Lakers.”

Mary E, Ontario

Thank you from the bottom of our hearts to all the Adopt-a-Beach volunteers and Alliance Ambassadors working to protect our Great Lakes!

Read all the messages to our volunteers.

The post “Thank you for helping our Great Lakes shine!” appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/04/thank-you-for-helping-our-great-lakes-shine/

Judy Freed

Litter Material: 2003-2023. Plastic: 86%. Other: 14%.

CHICAGO, IL (April 11, 2024) Eighty six percent of litter collected on Great Lakes beaches is composed either partially or fully of plastic, according to a new report released by the Alliance for the Great Lakes. The report is based on 20 years of data collected from more than 14,000 Adopt-a-Beach cleanups on all five Great Lakes. The new analysis details the most common types of plastic items found on Great Lakes shorelines and outlines potential solutions to reduce plastic pollution. In the environment, plastics never go away. Instead, they break down into toxic microplastic particles that make their way into the Great Lakes, a source of drinking water for 40 million people. 

Plastic pollution threatens human health & the environment

“Plastic pollution in the Great Lakes is a threat to both human health and the environment,” said Olivia Reda, the author of the report and the Volunteer Engagement Manager at the Alliance for the Great Lakes. “The volume of plastic found on our shorelines demonstrates the urgent need to pass federal, state, and local laws that reduce plastic pollution getting into the lakes. While our dedicated volunteers are cleaning up literally tons of litter each year, more of this plastic litter enters our waters, where it breaks down into tiny particles that are found in our drinking water.” 

Litter type: 2014-2023. Tiny trash: 40%. Food related: 27%. Smoking related: 22%. Other: 11%.

The data in the report, Adopt-a-Beach: 20 Years of Great Lakes Litter Data, reveals alarming and consistent patterns. Most of the litter is plastic, and many are single-use items – used once and left behind – which contain plastic. Volunteers categorize each piece of litter into a type, such as cigarette butts, plastic beverage bottles, or “tiny trash” including plastic pieces, foam pieces, and glass pieces measuring 2.5 cm or less. For the last 10 years, the top litter items collected are tiny plastic pieces, followed by cigarette butts, tiny foam pieces, plastic bottle caps, and food wrappers. Forty percent of all litter is in the “tiny trash” category.  

Solutions require action beyond individual behavior change

While it’s important for individuals to reduce their plastic use, the report notes that substantially reducing plastic pollution will require action from businesses, governments, and manufacturers. The Alliance for the Great Lakes is calling for implementing Extended Producer Responsibility policies — holding producers responsible across the life cycle of their products and packaging from design and materials to end-of-life management. Such policies have been in place for years in Europe and the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec. More recently California, Colorado, Maine, and Oregon have passed versions of these common-sense solutions, which are now being considered across the Great Lakes basin. 

Shorter-term solutions include reducing or eliminating the most problematic plastics like single-use bags and foam, deploying new technologies such as microfilters in washing machines to remove plastic microfibers before they enter our water systems, stopping the spills of industrial plastic pellets in the Great Lakes, and increasing access to water refilling stations as well as reuse and refill packaging. These types of policy solutions are moving forward in several Great Lakes states. 

The power of citizen science

9,702,320 pieces of litter.

Since launching in 1991, the Alliance’s Adopt-a-Beach cleanups have evolved into the most extensive volunteer program ever to collect data on Great Lakes beach litter. Volunteers receive training and resources to host year-round cleanups in communities in all eight Great Lakes states. Since the start of the program, over 200,000 volunteers have participated in cleanups, removing over 9,700,000 individual pieces and over 535,000 pounds of litter from the shoreline. In 2003, Adopt-a-Beach launched an online database, which is now the largest litter dataset exclusively for the Great Lakes. The data is available publicly and has been used by educators, community advocates, policy makers, and academic researchers. 

“This dataset demonstrates the power of citizen science, when members of the public come together to collect datasets far larger than any single researcher could build,” said Reda. “We are so thankful to the hundreds of thousands of volunteers and supporters who participated in Adopt-a-Beach cleanups over the years. They are environmental heroes committed to reducing litter in their communities and are collecting one-of-a-kind data that will continue shining a light on plastic pollution.” 

Report cover, Adopt-a-Beach: 20 Years of Great Lakes Litter Data.

Read the Report

Download the full report – Adopt-a-Beach: 20 Years of Great Lakes Litter Data, A Story of Plastic Pollution Told Through Citizen Science

Download the Executive Summary

If you would like to join the efforts, sign up for an Adopt-a-Beach cleanup. Learn more about plastic pollution here.

###

Contact: Don Carr, Media Director, dcarr@greatlakes.org

 

The post New Report: Vast Majority of Great Lakes Litter is Plastic appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/04/new-report-vast-majority-of-great-lakes-litter-is-plastic/

Judy Freed

LANSING, MI (April 3, 2024) – Nutrient pollution is a severe threat to water quality across the Great Lakes region and is particularly important in the Western Basin of Lake Erie. Understanding, tracking, and predicting where this pollution comes from is difficult due to weather and cropping complexities and a lack of data. This makes it difficult to properly target where conservation funding should be spent.

Through a new $4.86 million grant from the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (MDARD) and a $600,000 grant from the Erb Family Foundation, the Alliance for the Great Lakes will work in partnership with MDARD to increase the agency’s ability track and monitor water quality in five of Michigan’s priority subwatersheds of the Western Basin of Lake Erie. Technical assistance will be provided by the Michigan State University Institute of Water Research and LimnoTech.

The partnership aims to increase monitoring capacity by deploying higher spatial density monitoring instrumentation with a particular focus on understanding phosphorus trends. The information gleaned from this effort will help MDARD better understand various drivers of nutrient transport and allow for better targeting of conservation efforts to combat nutrient pollution.

“Ultimately, understanding where nutrient pollution is coming from and how it travels through the watershed will allow agencies and practitioners to better target conservation and land management practices to improve water quality outcomes. We are excited to partner with MDARD on this effort and applaud the leadership of Director Boring who has continually emphasized the importance of expanding monitoring and data collection to help guide conservation decision making,” said Tom Zimnicki, Alliance for the Great Lakes’ Agriculture and Restoration Policy Director.

“Our department has recognized the need for improved water quality monitoring in WLEB. We know that more holistic farm management focusing on soil health and regenerative agriculture principles can be expected to improve nutrient losses. Through the State of Michigan’s Domestic Action Plan adaptive management approach of continuous assessment and improvement, the scientific outcomes of this work improve our ability to make meaningful progress toward water quality improvements,” said MDARD Director Tim Boring.

The project will run from 2024 to 2029 and cover five of Michigan’s priority sub watersheds – Lime Creek, Stony Creek (South Branch River Raisin), Headwaters of the Saline River, Nile Ditch, and the S.S. LaPointe Drain. Area hydrology, sediment transport, and phosphorus transport in the sub watersheds will be tracked by the program. Data collected will be publicly available.

###

Contact: Don Carr, Media Director, dcarr@greatlakes.org

More about Nutrient Pollution

Read more about agricultural runoff and harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie.

Read More

The post New MDARD Partnership Will Improve Water Quality Monitoring appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/04/new-mdard-partnership-will-improve-water-quality-monitoring/

Judy Freed

CHICAGO, IL (March 25, 2024) Last week on World Water Day, the Alliance for the Great Lakes, Ocean Conservancy, Illinois Environmental Council, and Loyola University scientists held a press conference with partners at the Museum of Science and Industry to discuss protecting the Great Lakes and waterways from the environmental and health risks of microfiber pollution. The Great Lakes provide drinking water for more than 30 million people and are home to diverse and increasingly threatened wildlife. However, the Great Lakes are in the midst of a plastic pollution crisis, with plastic waste increasingly accumulating in our waterways. To address this issue, Illinois lawmakers have introduced a bill that would require microfiber capture devices on all washing machines sold in Illinois by 2030.   

“What happens in Illinois impacts the ocean – whether through the Great Lakes, whose water flows through the St. Lawrence Seaway to the Atlantic, or through the Mississippi River flowing into the Gulf of Mexico. Microplastics can even be carried by evaporated water and spread through our weather systems around the world. Washing machines are a major contributor to plastic microfiber pollution, and Ocean Conservancy is proud to support this bill to stop microplastics at the source,” said Jeff Watters, Vice President, External Affairs at Ocean Conservancy. 

“For over 30 years, Alliance for the Great Lakes Adopt-a-Beach volunteers have been on the front lines of keeping litter off our beaches and out of the Great Lakes by removing over half a million pounds of litter from shorelines since 1991. Most of the litter collected is composed either partially or fully of plastic. The good news is that if we act now, we can stop the pollution before it makes its way into our waterways through simple washing machine filters like those used in dryers. Our dedicated volunteers shouldn’t be the only means to keep plastic pollution out of the Great Lakes. We need smart policies to reduce microplastic pollution, which is why we fully support Illinois House Bill 4269,” said Molly Flanagan, Chief Operating Officer & Vice President for Programs of the Alliance for the Great Lakes.  

“Our research group has been studying litter in our waterways for over 10 years. The vast majority of the trash we find is plastic, and increasingly, microfibers are the most common microplastic in our waterways. Preventing pollution at the source is critical; washing machine filters are a simple and cost-effective solution. This approach is important and can make meaningful improvements to reduce pollution,” said Dr. Tim Hoellein, Associate Professor, Loyola University, Director Aquatic Ecology Lab.  

Plastic microfibers that come from plastic-based textiles and clothing are of growing concern. Microfibers are the most prevalent form of microplastics in environmental samples and represent over 90% of microplastics ingested by marine animals.  In animals, ingestion of microfibers has been shown to reduce food consumption, reduce energy for growth, alter gene expression, and block digestive tracts

In many cases, microfibers that are shed from clothing during household and commercial laundering escape wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and flow with the discharge into our waterways. An existing technology, washing machine microfiber filters, have been shown to be a cost-effective solution that can capture up to 90% of microfibers from each load of laundry, leading to a significant reduction in microfibers in wastewater treatment plants. 

A fact sheet on microfibers can be found here.

Photos from the event can be found here.

### 

About Alliance for the Great Lakes 

The Alliance for the Great Lakes is a nonpartisan nonprofit working across the region to protect our most precious resource: the fresh, clean, and natural waters of the Great Lakes. For more information, visit greatlakes.org.  

About Ocean Conservancy   

Ocean Conservancy is working to protect the ocean from today’s greatest global challenges. Together with our partners, we create evidence-based solutions for a healthy ocean and the wildlife and communities that depend on it. For more information, visit oceanconservancy.org, or follow us on Facebook, Twitter or Instagram. 

Contact:

Don Carr, Media Director, Alliance for the Great Lakes, dcarr@greatlakes.org, +1 (651) 395-4270
Roya Fox, Communications Manager, Ocean Conservancy, rfox@oceanconservancy.org, +1 (206) 948-7874

Great Lakes Plastic Pollution

Plastic pollution is a serious problem for the Great Lakes. Learn more about plastic pollution and how to stop it.

Learn More

The post New Bill to Protect Great Lakes, Drinking Water from Microplastics Receives Support from Environmental Groups appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

Original Article

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

https://greatlakes.org/2024/03/new-bill-to-protect-great-lakes-drinking-water-from-microplastics-receives-support-from-environmental-groups/

Judy Freed

This opinion piece was first published by the Chicago Sun-Times.


By Molly Flanagan, COO & Vice President for Programs

While Illinois didn’t bring ecosystem-destroying invasive carp to the United States, the state is setting itself up for the blame if the voracious fish overrun the Great Lakes.

Just after Thanksgiving last year, when all of us were still too full to eat another bite, almost a million pounds of hungry invasive carp were pulled from the Illinois River in just one day. Using the Illinois River and other waterways to expand their territory, invasive carp pose a significant threat to the ecological and economic health of Lake Michigan.

Invasive carp have already wreaked havoc on the Mississippi and Illinois rivers. They cause serious damage to native fish populations when they invade lakes and rivers because they out-compete other fish for food. They jump into the air, posing the risk of serious injury to people and making infested waters off-limits to boating. Great Lakes’ communities and industries would be deeply harmed if Invasive carp get into the Great Lakes and its tributaries and inland lakes.

Invasive carp are located less than 50 miles from Lake Michigan. With no known predators once they are past the juvenile stage, these fish pose a severe threat to the economic health of the Great Lakes, specifically the region’s $7 billion commercial and sport fishing industry and its $16 billion recreational boating industry.

For that reason, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Army Corps) has identified building additional structural measures at the Brandon Road Lock and Dam near Joliet as the most feasible way to prevent the upstream migration of invasive carp. By using a series of measures designed to stymie invasive carp, the Brandon Road project will act as the choke point to stop invasive carp from traveling from the Mississippi River Basin into the Great Lakes.

The $1.3 billion project is scheduled to begin construction in October of 2024. That’s good news, because those nearly million pounds of carp taken in one day — the same amount harvested in all of 2022 — are amassed only two locks down from Brandon Road. The bad news is that there’s a huge obstacle to building the defenses at Brandon Road: the state of Illinois.

    Michigan and Illinois have agreed to pay $114 million, the entire amount required from local partners, for construction of the project. The federal government has $274 million on hand ready to spend to complete design and engineering, and for the first increment of construction. The project is ready to start once Illinois signs the Project Partnership Agreement with the Army Corps. The state’s manageable concerns about the project have been the subject of seemingly endless delays, even as the state of Michigan has come forward cash in hand and the feds are ready to break ground.

    For every month that Illinois does not sign the agreement with the Army Corps, more time is lost. And time is running out to keep invasive carp out of the Great Lakes. Luckily, the state of Michigan is patiently waiting as a willing partner to move Brandon Road forward. All Illinois needs to do to is to say yes to the partnership. Surely the strongest protection for our Great Lakes after a decade of planning is enough of a reason for Illinois to sign on the line.

    Keep Invasive Carp Out of Lake Michigan

    Learn more about the Brandon Road Lock & Dam project and keeping invasive carp out of the Great Lakes.

    Learn More

    The post Time is running out to keep invasive carp out of Lake Michigan appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2024/03/time-is-running-out-to-keep-invasive-carp-out-of-lake-michigan/

    Judy Freed

    2024 Federal Policy Priorities

    Significant progress continues to be made in protecting and restoring the Great Lakes, but much more needs to be done. Although increased federal funding from the Infrastructure Investment Act these last two years has allowed states and the federal government to address some key issues, including water infrastructure and the cleanup of toxic legacy pollution, we still have too many Great Lakers experiencing polluted water. Invasive species continue to threaten the lakes, nutrient runoff continues to negatively affect our water quality, and plastic pollutes our beaches and drinking water. 

    In our 2024 federal policy priorities, we’ve identified the top five opportunities for Congress and federal agencies to address these challenges. Many of these priorities are familiar and are carried over from last year when Congress made little progress on substantive legislation. For the upcoming year, Congress and the administration must address key issues. These include passing an annual federal budget to provide states with sufficient federal resources to fix our ailing water infrastructure; enacting a Farm Bill that will reduce the flow of nutrient pollution into the lakes; maintaining progress on key federal projects intended to stop invasive species; and providing funding and reauthorization for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative to continue support for on-the-ground restoration projects.

    Equity and justice are embedded throughout these policy priorities and must be considered at every step of the federal decision-making process to ensure that all Great Lakers have access to safe, clean, affordable water. Repairing the long-term harm from environmental injustices isn’t a one-off action and federal decision-makers must prioritize disadvantaged communities where the burden of pollution and the lack of essential services often hit the hardest. Congress and the administration must ensure that community voices are at the table – and listened to – from the beginning of all decision-making.

    Read on for full details of our 2024 Great Lakes federal policy priorities, or download the fact sheet to learn more.

    Water infrastructure.

    Increase water infrastructure funding, prioritize funding for communities most in need  

    The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act passed by Congress late in 2021 was an important down payment to fix the nation’s failing and outdated water infrastructure. The funding will jump-start efforts to replace dangerous lead pipes, fix leaky pipes, and stop sewage overflows.

    However, the funding is only a start. EPA’s 7th national Drinking Water Needs Information Survey and Assessment, completed just last year, estimates that the Great Lakes region will need at least $225.2 billion over the next twenty years to fix our water infrastructure problems. This is an increase from the last national survey and indicates that federal funding is not keeping up with needs. Currently, the infrastructure bill will provide Great Lakes states with an additional $1.8 billion per year for the next five years. It is clearly not enough. We need to keep the pressure on Congress to provide additional funds for water infrastructure programs. Additionally, funding programs must be structured to ensure that money reaches communities with the highest need, such as those with many lead pipes.

    In 2024, we urge Congress to: 

    • Increase annual funding to at least $9.3 billion for the Drinking Water and Clean Water State Revolving Funds
    • Increase by $1 billion annual funding levels for lead service line replacement and emerging contaminants
    • Set aside at least 20 percent of the Clean Water State Revolving Fund as grants for green infrastructure projects such as green roofs, permeable pavement, and additional green spaces
    • Pass a federal ban on residential water shutoffs 
    • Establish a federal program to provide financial assistance for water and sewer bills 

    In 2024 we urge the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to: 

    • Require that states accepting federal funds from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 are increasing funding and technical assistance for disadvantaged communities so that they are equipped to advance through the SRF selection process 
    • Issue a final Lead and Copper Rule requiring cities to meet ambitious timelines for lead service line replacement

    Download the water infrastructure fact sheet.

    Agriculture.

    Pass a Farm Bill that prioritizes clean water 

    Agriculture is the largest unaddressed source of nonpoint pollution in the Great Lakes region. Runoff from agricultural lands puts the Great Lakes at risk. It pollutes drinking water, threatens wildlife, harms the regional economy, and prevents people from enjoying recreation on the Great Lakes. 

    Every five years, Congress develops a “Farm Bill,” a major package of legislation that sets the agenda and funding for national farm and food policy. Congress passed a one-year extension of the Farm Bill in 2023, so in 2024 Congress can pass a Farm Bill that ensures farms produce clean water, not pollution, along with their crops.    

    In 2024, we urge Congress to pass a Farm Bill that: 

    • Increases funding for U.S. Department of Agriculture conservation programs  
    • Includes provisions to ensure accountability for farm conservation programs aimed at stopping runoff pollution from agricultural lands
    • Reduces funding for concentrated animal feeding operations 

    Download the agriculture fact sheet.

    Plastic pollution.

    Pass legislation to stop plastic pollution  

    Researchers estimate that 22 million pounds of plastic pollution enter the Great Lakes each year. Plastic pollution isn’t just an unsightly problem in our waterways. It’s estimated that humans ingest a credit card-sized amount of plastic each week, with unknown long-term consequences for our health. 

    For many years, efforts to stop plastic pollution put the responsibility on the end-user, such as recycling. But only a fraction of plastic produced each year is recycled, leaving the remainder to end up in landfills or as litter that lands in our waterways. The alternative is to require plastic producers to be responsible for their products through their lifecycle, which is called extended producer responsibility. Congress has an opportunity to be a leader on this issue.  

    In 2024, we urge Congress to pass legislation that: 

    • Makes plastic waste producers responsible for its reduction 
    • Reduces the federal government’s use of single-use plastics, including polystyrene foam 
    • Funds additional research on the public health impact of plastics

    Download the plastic pollution fact sheet.

    Invasive species.

    Protect the Great Lakes from aquatic invasive species  

    Invasive species have caused irreparable harm to the Great Lakes ecosystem and cost the region billions of dollars since the late 1980s. Preventing them from ever entering is the best way to protect the Great Lakes. The battle against invasive species is focused on two fronts – stopping invasive carp from entering the Great Lakes and cleaning up ship ballast tanks.  

    Established populations of invasive carp are only 50 miles from Chicago and Lake Michigan. But it’s not too late to prevent them from reaching the lakes. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has proposed constructing additional carp prevention measures at the Brandon Road Lock and Dam near Joliet, Illinois. The facility is a critical choke point in the waterways leading to Lake Michigan. Congress and federal agencies must continue to support this project. 

    The St. Lawrence Seaway opened the Great Lakes to direct ocean-going shipping. Unfortunately, ships brought invasive species along for the ride in their ballast tanks. Although regulations to clean up ship ballast tanks have reduced introductions, loopholes remain for “lakers,” ships operating solely in the Great Lakes. The U.S. EPA can close that loophole. 

    In 2024, we urge Congress to: 

    • Include language in the next Water Resources Development Act to authorize 100 percent federal funding for the annual operations and maintenance of the Brandon Road Interbasin Project, which is being implemented to stop invasive carp from entering the Great Lakes 

    In 2024, we urge federal agencies to take the following actions: 

    • The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers should execute a Project Partnership Agreement with the State of Illinois for the Brandon Road Interbasin Project so that the project may proceed to phase 1 construction this fall and continue public participation for the project’s implementation
    • The U.S. EPA should issue final rules requiring all vessels operating on the Great Lakes, including lakers, to clean up their ballast tanks

    Download the invasive species fact sheet.

    Great Lakes restoration.

    Fund, update, and reauthorize the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative 

    The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) is one of the most important tools in the region’s toolbox to protect and restore the lakes. The program provides funding for on-the-ground restoration projects, from wetland restoration to cleaning up toxic hotspots. In addition to environmental benefits, GLRI funding garners an additional 3-to-1 return in economic benefits.  

    While we need continued investment in Great Lakes restoration, the strategy guiding the GLRI was developed almost 20 years ago and needs an update. Federal agencies should revise the Great Lakes restoration strategy to address the next generation of threats to the lakes, including climate change and long-standing environmental injustices. In addition, the program’s authorization will expire in 2026, so action will be needed by Congress in the near future to reauthorize and extend the GLRI program. 

    In 2024, we urge Congress to: 

    • Fund the GLRI with at least $450 million in FY 2024
    • Reauthorize the GLRI program at $500 million per year for five years from FY 2027-2031

    In 2024, we urge the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to take the following action: 

    • U.S. EPA should issue the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan IV to address environmental injustice, climate resilience, and the next generation of risks to the Great Lakes

    Download the Great Lakes restoration fact sheet.

    The post Top 5 Great Lakes Federal Policy Priorities for 2024 appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2024/02/top-5-great-lakes-federal-policy-priorities-for-2024/

    Judy Freed

    The post Pop Quiz: Great Lakes Restoration appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2024/02/pop-quiz-great-lakes-restoration/

    Judy Freed

    WASHINGTON, D.C. (February 6, 2024) – Today, Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), Senator J.D. Vance (R-OH), Representative Debbie Dingell (D-MI), and Representative David Joyce (R-OH) sponsored the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) Act of 2024, a bill intended to reauthorize the GLRI program for a five-year period at $500 million per year.

    GLRI funding assists states, tribes and local communities in implementing crucial on-the-ground projects, including habitat restoration, helping farmers do more to combat non-point source agrichemical run-off, cleaning up legacy pollution and toxic sediments, and preventing the establishment or spread of destructive invasive species. It is a well-established program that helps protect 22% of the world’s source of freshwater.

    “The Alliance would like to thank Senators Stabenow and Vance, and Representatives Dingell and Joyce for sponsoring bipartisan legislation to continue this important program that directly benefits the tens of millions of Americans living in the Great Lakes region,” said Don Jodrey, Alliance for the Great Lakes Director of Federal Government Relations.

    “As members of the Great Lakes Task Forces, many champions from both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives have tirelessly advocated for the GLRI and the Alliance thanks them for their support,” said Jodrey.

    “The creation of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative is one of the most important actions of my legislative career.  Since I authored the program in 2010, it has been a proven success story,” said Senator Stabenow, Co-Chair of the Senate Great Lakes Task Force. “This bill will ensure the stability and future of the program as we address new emerging threats to our Great Lakes and waters.”

    “The Great Lakes provide more than 1.5 million jobs, supply 90 percent of our nation’s fresh surface water, and generate $62 billion in wages every year,” said Congressman Joyce, Co-Chair of the House Great Lakes Task Force. “The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative supports efforts that confront direct threats facing the lakes like harmful algal blooms, water pollution, invasive species, and coastal erosion. I am proud to be working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to reintroduce this critical legislation to protect and preserve the national treasure that is the Great Lakes ecosystem.”

    To date, the GLRI program has funded more than 7,563 individual projects totaling $3.7 billion, greatly improving the quality of life throughout the region. The GLRI also provides major economic benefits, as it is estimated that for every dollar spent, an additional three dollars of value is added to the regional economy.

    ### 

    Contact: Don Carr, Media Director, dcarr@greatlakes.org

    More about Great Lakes Restoration

    Read more about Great Lakes restoration and the GLRI.

    Learn More

    The post Health of the Lakes and Strength of Local Economies Relies on Reauthorization of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2024/02/health-of-the-lakes-and-strength-of-local-economies-relies-on-reauthorization-of-the-great-lakes-restoration-initiative/

    Judy Freed

    CHICAGO (February 5, 2024) – In November 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed improvements to the nation’s drinking water rules to finally address the widespread use of dangerous lead pipes for American drinking water. The Great Lakes region contains by far the greatest number of lead service lines of any region in the country, and so has borne an especially heavy burden from this toxic legacy that still endures.  

    Today, the Alliance for the Great Lakes submitted comments to EPA aimed at improving the rule and raising concerns with the agency over the rule’s scope and timetable for action. The most important issue for EPA to address is a proposed exception that could allow lead pipes to persist in Great Lakes metropolitan areas like Chicago for over 40 years.  

    The Alliance’s comments include:  

    • U.S. EPA should require that systems with the greatest number of lead service lines meet ambitious minimum replacement rates set as a percentage of their total lead service lines, with such rates revisited to ensure maximum feasible replacement over time. 
    • U.S. EPA should further tighten the Action Level to 5 ppb to protect public health, ensure systems are using effective corrosion control treatment, and further promote outreach and education that can help spur lead service line replacement and other removal of lead from water systems.  
    • The Alliance supports U.S. EPA’s proposed enhanced transparency measures and requests that U.S. EPA (a) include requirements that posted information be easily searchable, extractable and exportable, and (b) remove the 50,000-resident threshold for online provision of lead service line replacement plans.  
    • The Alliance supports and suggests ways to bolster U.S. EPA’s emphasis in the Proposed Rule on environmental justice and civil rights obligations pertaining to lead service line replacement and overall Lead and Copper Rule compliance. 

    “The Alliance welcomes these long-awaited improvements to the federal Lead and Copper Rule and encourages U.S. EPA to issue a strengthened final rule that delivers on the Administration’s promise to the country and the Great Lakes region. Addressing lead service lines once and for all will bring huge benefits to the region by reducing negative impacts to childhood development and improving cardiac health. President Biden and the EPA should be commended for moving forward with this rule,” said Meleah Geertsma, Alliance for the Great Lakes’ Director of Clean Water and Equity.  

    “At the same time, the Alliance believes the Proposed Rule risks leaving the most burdened too far behind by allowing significant extensions of the timeframe for lead service line replacement in cities with the greatest number of lead service lines, including the Great Lakes cities of Chicago and Cleveland,” said Geertsma.  

    ### 

    Contact: Don Carr, Media Director, dcarr@greatlakes.org 

    More about Lead Service Lines

    Read more about lead service lines in Great Lakes Communities.

    Learn More

    The post EPA’s Lead and Copper Rule Improvements Can Demonstrate Biden Administration’s Commitment to Protecting Human Health  appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2024/02/epas-lead-and-copper-rule-improvements-can-demonstrate-biden-administrations-commitment-to-protecting-human-health/

    Judy Freed

    Donald Jodrey headshot.
    Don Jodrey, Director of Federal Government Relations

    This blog is part of a series of updates from Don Jodrey, the Alliance’s Director of Federal Government Relations, with his view on Great Lakes policy from Washington, DC.

    At the beginning of 2023, we announced an ambitious Great Lakes federal policy agenda. We noted that it was the start of a new Congress and an era of divided government. We predicted that there were likely to be major policy disagreements between the Republican House, the Democratic Senate, and the Biden administration that might result in a stalemate or lack of progress on some issues, particularly where legislation is required.

    We were correct in anticipating major policy disagreements, but we did not envision how dysfunctional the year would be in this Congress where a very small group of conservative House members have managed to delay action on some of Congress’ most basic tasks, including preventing the Congress from passing an annual budget for the federal government.

    Major funding disagreements for water infrastructure

    As we approach the year mark after we released our federal priorities last year, we note that Congress has enacted another short-term continuing resolution until early March for the fiscal year which started last October. And although the House and Senate leadership have agreed upon a top-line number for domestic spending, it is unclear when final spending levels will be resolved between the House and Senate among the 12 bills that fund the government. There are major disagreements between the House and Senate over the level of funding for water infrastructure with the House proposing more than $1.7 billion in cuts from levels supported by the Senate. This would reduce the funding available to communities to address drinking water and wastewater issues.

    Farm Bill discussions continue

    Another legislative casualty this year was the Farm Bill. The House and Senate were unable to advance a new five-year Farm Bill. Instead, they agreed to a one-year extension of the current program. We continue to encourage Great Lakes members to support increased funding for conservation programs, as well as provisions to ensure accountability for conservation programs that address harmful agricultural runoff pollution, particularly in Lake Erie. We are pleased that Representatives Marcy Kaptur from Ohio and Mike Gallagher from Wisconsin have introduced the Healthy Farms Healthy Watersheds Act to reduce nutrient runoff and thereby reduce harmful algal blooms. The legislation would help farmers reduce phosphorus pollution by better targeting farm bill conservation dollars where they would have the most impact.

    Plastics legislation is introduced

    Discussions continue in Congress on efforts to control plastic pollution. Several key pieces of legislation have been introduced in the House and Senate. First, Illinois Senator Dick Durbin reintroduced “The Plastic Pellet Free Waters Act” to address the problems posed by plastic pellets in our waters, including the Great Lakes. The bill would prohibit the discharge of plastic pellets and other pre-production plastics into the Great Lakes and waterways across the country. Plastic pellets, like other microplastics, pose a danger to human health, fish, wildlife, and ecosystems. In addition, Oregon Senator Jeff Merkley has reintroduced the “Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act” which provides a comprehensive approach to plastic pollution reduction by creating a national policy and requirements for extended producer responsibility which would require corporations to take responsibility for post-consumer management of plastic products and packaging. Other legislative efforts include bills that would impose an excise tax on the production of virgin plastic, as well as legislation that would ban the use of polystyrene foam. It is unlikely that any of these efforts will become law in this Congress, but we will continue to support them and educate members on the harmful environmental impacts caused by plastic pollution.

    Great Lakes Restoration Initiative continues to receive strong bipartisan support

    One program that continues to have robust bipartisan support is the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. The House proposes to fund this program at the current funding level and the Senate proposes a $5 million increase. The Great Lakes Restoration Initiative’s goals are: fish that are safe to eat, water that is safe for recreation, a safe source of drinking water, clean up Areas of Concern, eliminate harmful algal blooms, prevent the introduction of new invasive species and control existing invasive species, and protect and restore habitat to sustain native species.

    States step up to fund invasive carp protections

    Following up on last year’s Congressional authorization to change the Brandon Road project’s construction cost share to 90 percent federal and 10 percent state, the Brandon Road project received funding boosts this year from the States of Illinois and Michigan. The combined $115 million will cover the entire state share of the estimated construction costs for the project. The next step is for the State of Illinois and the U.S Army Corps of Engineers to sign a project partnership agreement so that construction can begin in 2024. This project is critical to keeping invasive carp out of the Great Lakes.

    Environmental Protection Agency takes action

    This past year the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) took several actions that affect the Great Lakes. First, the agency issued its 7th national Drinking Water Needs Assessment survey that assesses the health of the nation’s drinking water infrastructure. For the first time, the assessment included information on the number of lead service lines in each state. Unfortunately, Great Lakes states water infrastructure needs have increased since the last national drinking water needs assessment was completed. Collectively, EPA estimates that the Great Lakes region needs at least $225.3 billion over the next twenty years to fix failing water infrastructure.

    EPA also proposed a supplemental rule to regulate ballast water in the Great Lakes. This is necessary to prevent the spread of harmful aquatic invasive species. Although EPA proposes to exempt existing Lakers (ships that do not leave the Great Lakes) from installing ballast water treatment systems, EPA does propose requiring that new Lakers, or those constructed after 2026, install ballast water treatment. We provided extensive comments to EPA recommending that all Lakers be required to install ballast water treatment systems. The agency’s final rule is expected later this year.

    Lastly, EPA is updating the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Strategy by developing its next action plan, which will cover the next five years of funding for this program. We have recommended that EPA address environmental justice and climate change along with its environmental restoration priorities. A draft plan will be released for public comment later this year.

    Looking ahead, your voice matters

    Although not all our priorities advanced this past year, your voice makes a difference. Contact federal decision-makers about the Great Lakes issues that you care about. Great Lakes members of Congress need to hear from you about prioritizing funding to ensure every community has safe drinking water. They need to hear what federal legislation or existing programs would help address environmental concerns in your community, like harmful algal blooms or reducing plastic pollution. Let your members of Congress and other federal decision-makers know how important clean and healthy Great Lakes are to you.

    Protect the Great Lakes & Our Communities

    Too many Great Lakers experience polluted water – whether it is lead-tainted water coming from taps in homes or algal blooms fouling beaches. Visit our Action Center and learn how you can take action.

    Take Action

    The post DC Update: Are Great Lakes Priorities Advancing After a Year of Divided Government? appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2024/01/dc-update-are-great-lakes-priorities-advancing-after-a-year-of-divided-government/

    Judy Freed

    On December 6, 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) took an important step in protecting public health by proposing to significantly strengthen national drinking water regulations for toxic lead and copper. Most notably, U.S. EPA is proposing a requirement to remove lead service lines within 10 years for most water systems.

    Lead is a heavy metal and neurotoxin that harms the brain and nervous system, leading to slowed growth and development, learning and behavior problems, and hearing and speech problems in children. Lead is also linked to negative health impacts in adults, such as reproductive problems, increased risk of high blood pressure, cardiovascular effects, and harm to the kidneys. Experts widely agree that there is no safe level of lead exposure.

    For decades, lead was used in service lines, fixtures and solder throughout water systems; it was not until 1986 that Congress banned the use of new lead pipes and fixtures. Following the Flint tragedy that helped propel the issue of lead in drinking water as a national priority, advocates including the Alliance for the Great Lakes have been calling on local, state and federal officials to get the lead out of water systems. A major focus has been to mandate the removal of lead service lines that are often the largest contributors to lead levels in home drinking water.

    U.S. EPA is now proposing a national mandate that water systems remove their lead service lines, with a default timeline for removal of 10 years. However, that mandate is substantially weakened by a proposed exception to the time frame for cities with the most lead service lines – including a number of cities in the Great Lakes region. Under the proposed rule, these cities could get decades more to remove lead service lines, including over 40 years for Chicago. It’s unacceptable that EPA would allow this pollution to persist for so long in some of the most impacted communities in our region.

    In addition to calling for removal of lead service lines, advocates have called on U.S. EPA to strengthen requirements around water sampling for lead and copper, including the levels that trigger a response by a water system (known as the “action levels”) and what actions water systems must take when sampling exceeds the action levels. Advocates also have demanded enhanced public notice and engagement, to ensure that communities have a real say in how their water utilities respond to high levels of lead and copper. Along with mandating removal of lead service lines, U.S. EPA’s proposed rule strengthens the sampling requirements and action levels while enhancing public notice and participation requirements. The Alliance will be seeking additional improvements in these areas in our comments to U.S. EPA. 

    To help address lead in drinking water, Congress has increased the amount of federal money that is available for lead service line removal. For example, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 (IIJA) included $15 billion nationally for lead service line removal. EPA has been distributing this increased funding for lead service line removal to states for the last two years through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, with three more years of funding distributions left. That said, the need for additional action on funding for lead service line removal is significant – based on current lead line inventories, estimates for full removal range from $45-60 billion nationally.

    U.S. EPA is accepting comments on the proposal through February 5, 2024, and is holding a virtual public hearing on the proposal on January 16, 2024 (to register, click here). The Alliance and our coalition partners will submit comments supporting, and requests for strengthening, the proposed rule. We hope U.S. EPA will move expeditiously to consider comments and adopt the strongest final rule possible, and we look forward to working closely with communities and water systems to ensure robust and speedy compliance.

    More about Drinking Water

    Read more about protecting drinking water in Great Lakes communities.

    Learn More

    The post Proposed EPA rule would strengthen protections against lead in drinking water, but timetable leaves too many Great Lakes residents in danger  appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2023/12/proposed-epa-rule/

    Judy Freed

    Joint statement from the Alliance for the Great Lakes and the National Wildlife Federation Great Lakes Regional Center

    Ann Arbor, MI (October 8, 2023) – Fifteen years after federal approval of an historic Compact to protect Great Lakes water from diversion and unwise use, conservation groups are celebrating the revolutionary water management regime that secures the Great Lakes for future generations.

    “For the past fifteen years, the Great Lakes Compact has served as a beacon to the world of how to manage freshwater resources.” said Marc Smith, policy director for the National Wildlife Federation Great Lakes Regional Center. “While we continue to face the unpredictable impacts of climate change, the Compact protects the Great Lakes from increasing demands from a thirsty world, and does this in a way that sustains Great Lakes water use that protects our economy and way of life.”

    “The Compact is an enduring example of what our region can accomplish when we work together to protect the Great Lakes,” said Molly Flanagan, Vice President for Programs for the Alliance for the Great Lakes. “The Compact is working to protect the lakes from diversion threats from other parts of the country and the world. We must remain vigilant to ensure that the Great Lakes states are each doing their part to uphold the Compact and protect the lakes at home.”

    This month marks the fifteenth anniversary of former President Bush signing into law the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact. The eight-state water management pact—known as the Compact—protects the nation’s largest surface fresh water resource from depletion and diversions. A companion agreement, the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement, was signed in December 2005 by the Governors of the Great Lakes states and Premiers of the Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec.

    Together, the Compact and Agreement required the eight Great Lakes states of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin and the two Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec to develop water conservation and efficiency goals and programs for all users, created and implemented comprehensive water management programs and established baselines for water use.

    Since enacted in 2008, the Great Lakes Compact has faced challenges to its strength and effectiveness. In 2016, the eight Great Lakes states voted to approve Waukesha, Wisconsin’s Lake Michigan diversion request. After a rigorous process that involved multiple revisions, multiple changes and robust public participation, the Compact Council made several changes and approved Waukesha’s proposal with conditions. Ultimately, the Great Lakes Governors showed that the Great Lakes Compact works and ensured that the first diversion proposal met the high standards of the Compact.

    The Great Lakes contain more than 90 percent of the fresh surface water in the United States, and 20 percent of the world’s supply. Seemingly abundant, less than 1 percent of the Great Lakes water is renewed each year. This leaves the health of the lakes vulnerable to diversion and unwise use.

    The National Wildlife Federation and the Alliance for the Great Lakes and many other regional and state conservation organizations played major roles for over five years of negotiations, three years of making its way through each of the Great Lakes states and provinces, and final passage in Congress. This process enjoyed an unprecedented level of cooperation among state and provincial leaders in developing the Compact and Agreement and working with numerous and diverse stakeholders to finally enact this Agreement.

    ###

    Media contact: Don Carr, Alliance for the Great Lakes, dcarr@greatlakes.org

    The post Great Lakes Compact Celebrates 15th Anniversary appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2023/12/great-lakes-compact-celebrates-15th-anniversary/

    Judy Freed

    The Alliance for the Great Lakes is proud to announce that we’ve been awarded top charitable ratings from Charity Navigator, Guidestar, and GreatNonprofits. The ratings recognize our organization’s financial health, accountability, and transparency, as well as feedback from volunteers and donors.

    Charity Navigator four-star rating badge.

    Charity Navigator, America’s largest independent charity evaluator, awarded the Alliance for the Great Lakes a top Four-Star Rating. This rating designates the Alliance as an official “Give with Confidence” charity, indicating that our organization is using donations effectively based on Charity Navigator’s criteria. Nonprofits can earn Charity Navigator scores for Impact & Results, Accountability & Finance, Culture & Community, and Leadership & Adaptability.

    Guidestar's Candid Platinum Transparency 2023 seal.

    Guidestar, the worlds’ largest source of nonprofit information, awarded the Alliance for the Great Lakes its Platinum Seal of Transparency, the highest level of recognition. The award recognizes organizations with a high level of fiscal and programmatic accountability and transparency.

    GreatNonprofits 2023 Top-Rated Nonprofit badge.

    GreatNonprofits, the leading website for community recommendations of charities and nonprofits, named Alliance for the Great Lakes a 2023 Top-Rated Nonprofit. The Top-Rated Nonprofit Award is based on the rating and number of reviews that the Alliance received from volunteers and donors.

    The post Alliance Earns Three Top Charity Ratings appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2023/11/alliance-earns-three-top-charity-ratings/

    Judy Freed

    Chicago, IL (October 9, 2023) – The City of Waukesha, Wisconsin began supplying Lake Michigan water to its residents today. This is the first diversion of Great Lakes water to a community outside the Great Lakes Basin approved under the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence River Basin Resources Compact.

    In response, Alliance for the Great Lakes COO and Vice President for Programs Molly Flanagan issued the following statement:

    “Today marks the official start of Waukesha, Wisconsin’s water diversion from Lake Michigan, the first approved by the eight Great Lakes states under the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact. Due to radium contamination in their local water supply, Waukesha applied for and was granted a diversion of water from Lake Michigan in 2016.      

    “In response to criticism from the Alliance for the Great Lakes and advocates across the region, the Compact Council required Waukesha to decrease the amount of its diversion, shrink the service area that would receive Lake Michigan water, and return all diverted water back to Lake Michigan via the Root River. This results in no net loss of water from the lakes, which is required by the Great Lakes Compact.

    “Since Waukesha’s initial diversion approval seven years ago, the Alliance for the Great Lakes has been encouraged by the steps all eight Great Lakes states and the premierships of Ontario and Quebec have taken to ensure Waukesha complies with policies meant to protect the Great Lakes that are outlined in this agreement.

    “The Great Lakes Compact is a testament to what the region can achieve when it works together. The Great Lakes represent a one-time gift from the glaciers thousands of years ago – less than 1 percent of the waters in the Great Lakes are renewed annually through rainfall and snowmelt. Therefore, the lakes are vulnerable to misuse, and we should never take our water for granted. This water is critical to our lives and livelihoods in our region. The Compact protects the Great Lakes from being depleted to address water issues in other parts of the country and the world.

    “The Alliance will be watching closely and expects the Compact Council, Regional Body, and their members to ensure that Waukesha meets all the requirements of its diversion approval. The Great Lakes Compact turns 15 this year, and it is working. These safeguards are critical to preserving the Great Lakes so that they remain vibrant and continue to be shared economic, ecological, and cultural assets for the region.”

    ###

    Media contact: Please connect with our media team at TeamGreatLakes@mrss.com.

    More about the Great Lakes Compact

    Read more about the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence River Basin Resources Compact.

    Learn More

    The post Waukesha’s Diversion of Lake Michigan Water Highlights the Importance of the Great Lakes Compact appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2023/10/waukeshas-diversion-of-lake-michigan-water-highlights-the-importance-of-the-great-lakes-compact/

    Judy Freed

    For our Diving Deep for Solutions series, we commissioned author and journalist Kari Lydersen to examine big issues facing the lakes today and how our expert team at the Alliance for the Great Lakes is growing to meet the moment.


    In 2014, harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie contaminated Toledo’s water system, leaving residents without clean drinking water and leaders scrambling to deal with the public health emergency. It was a symbol of the greatest water pollution threat facing big swathes of the Great Lakes region, even after hundreds of millions of dollars were spent on mitigation efforts sparked by the Lake Erie crisis.   

    A hand covered with algae from the 2014 western Lake Erie algal bloom.

    Agriculture is one of the major industries and employers in the Great Lakes basin, producing more than $15 billion in livestock and crops per year. But with current farming methods, the ecosystem can’t handle the massive amounts of runoff from fertilizer –  manure and chemical – which pollutes waterways with phosphorus and nitrogen that feed algae blooms. These algal blooms can become toxic – which we have observed in Lake Erie – and can also create “dead zones” by robbing water of oxygen when algae decays. 

    The problem will only get worse with climate change, which is expected to cause more severe rains and warmer temperatures, meaning more runoff and conditions even more conducive to algal blooms. Meanwhile climate change is also expected to increase the intensity of agriculture in the region, as the growing season gets longer and new crops can be grown further north than before. Pesticide and herbicide use is also expected to increase due to shifting pest pressures linked to climate change. Increased usage of these products may lead to additional surface and groundwater pollution.    

    Hence, there is no time to waste in addressing the crisis of agricultural pollution in the Great Lakes. The Alliance for the Great Lakes has long been a leader on this issue, including in pushing for the agreement between Michigan, Ohio and Ontario, Canada to reduce phosphorus runoff into Lake Erie by 40% by 2025. 

    Voluntary measures fail to create significant progress; more aggressive and holistic approach is needed for Lake Erie

    It is clear that ambitious target won’t be met, and the Alliance and others are demanding more aggressive policy and a more holistic approach to the crisis. 

    Tom Zimnicki, Alliance Agriculture and Restoration Policy Director, noted that the agencies involved in the Lake Erie agreement “would be hard-pressed to identify any kind of quantifiable reductions that have been made from agricultural sources” in phosphorus pollution, despite hundreds of millions of dollars spent, mostly to pay farmers to voluntarily implement practices meant to curb runoff, like foregoing tilling, planting grass near waterways, and planting cover crops.  

    “We haven’t really seen voluntary programs work anywhere,” said Sara Walling, Clean Wisconsin’s Water and Agriculture Program Director, formerly the Alliance’s Senior Policy Manager for Agriculture and Restoration. “That’s not specific to the Great Lakes, it’s a fallacy everywhere. We’re just throwing money at the problem without accountability to make sure practices are implemented correctly, that they actually function as intended to, and are maintained over time.” 

    The failure to make significant progress through voluntary measures and incentives  underscores the need for federal action on agricultural pollution. This includes regulating farm runoff as a point source of pollution – in the same way releases from factories or power plants are regulated. 

    “Every other industry has standards around pollution prevention and risk mitigation for impacts to human health,” said Zimnicki. “Agriculture shouldn’t be any different. There are nuances to agriculture that make it more complicated than just saying, ‘Here is this manufacturing facility, let’s control what is coming out of that pipe.’ But there are things we can be looking at.” 

    In 2019, Ohio adopted a program known as “H2Ohio” to reduce nutrient pollution and address other water quality issues. Alliance Vice President of Policy and Strategic Engagement Crystal Davis was part of the technical assistance program for the effort. Davis – who is based in Cleveland – noted that there are multiple measures that could be adopted to quantify phosphorus in waterways, rather than just hoping best practices will reduce pollution. 

    “There’s edge-of-field monitoring, smart buoys in the water that can tell you how much pollution is in our waterways, we have a myriad of options,” she said.  

    Following a federal lawsuit, Ohio was required to develop a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for phosphorus – or “a pollution diet” as Zimnicki put it – for the Maumee River, a major tributary of Lake Erie. In September, U.S. EPA approved Ohio’s TMDL, however the plan lacks important conditions needed to improve water quality goals.

    Environmental injustice: Downstream water users pay the price for pollution generated upstream

    Not only does agricultural pollution pose a major economic and ecological threat to the region, it also can lead to environmental injustices. In the case of the Western Basin of Lake Erie, downstream ratepayers in Toledo bear the brunt of the health and financial impacts of agricultural pollution despite most of that pollution being generated upstream. The financial impacts of pollution exacerbate an ongoing water affordability crisis for lower-income residents of the City.  

    How much extra does a family of 5 in Toledo pay in their water bills due to upstream pollution? Almost $100 extra!

    As the Alliance documented in Ohio, low-income customers struggle to pay a disproportionate amount of their income for water, and are especially burdened when pollution necessitates more infrastructure investments – that are billed to customers, or when they need to buy bottled water because the tap water isn’t safe. 

    “We don’t have adequate representation from impacted and downstream communities,” noted Davis. “Equitable stakeholder engagement is paramount to the development of a strong plan that holds polluters accountable while making significant progress on phosphorus reduction goals,” Davis said.  

    A recent study by the Alliance for the Great Lakes and Ohio Environmental Council found that to achieve Lake Erie water quality targets, Michigan would need to increase funding by $40 to $65 million a year and Ohio by $170 to $250 million per year, on top of current spending. Such funding should also be secured long-term, rather than subject to approval in every budget cycle, the report emphasized.  

    Federal laws offer opportunities to regulate runoff

    The Farm Bill and federal pollution laws like the Clean Water Act offer opportunities to regulate agricultural runoff. Some farmers are encouraged to use riskier and more polluting practices since crop insurance covers their losses. Mandates and incentives for runoff reduction could be built into crop insurance, Alliance experts note. Walling said that’s especially appropriate since the government pays for federal crop insurance costs. 

    Farm field next to Maumee River, photo by Lloyd DeGrane

    “We as the public should be expecting more payback, if you will,” she said. “Not in actual dollars but in more environmental responsibility from the recipients. That’s not happening now.” 

    The federal government has the biggest role to play in restructuring things like crop insurance, farm subsidies and pollution-related mandates. Especially given the political and economic significance of farming in the Great Lakes states, the states “do need the federal government to come in with a heavier hand and give them a ‘thou shall’ rather than a ‘please,’” said Zimnicki. 

    The Alliance emphasizes that it is in farmers’ best interest to curb agricultural pollution and protect the Great Lakes, as well as their own bottom lines. And along with mandates, government support is crucial.  

    “Most farmers do want to leave the land in better shape than the day they took it over,” said Walling. “But there isn’t as much technical support available to help them. Even if something like planting cover crops is shown to benefit their long-term profitability, there’s a cost to making that change: buying that cover crop seed, planting it, changes in their yields as they work out the kinks. Their profit margins are so small, they can’t internalize those costs.” 

    Farmers and community leaders push change for Green Bay

    Green Bay in Wisconsin has also faced severe nutrient pollution from farming and algal blooms that harm the tourism and sport-fishing that is so popular in the region, including Wisconsin’s beloved Door County. 

    Cows grazing in a field. Photo credit Lloyd Degrade.

    “The entire economy is built around tourism, and access to the lake is the central piece,” said Walling. “Not having solid water quality is going to continue to affect the economic engine.” 

    In the Fox River basin that feeds Green Bay, many farmers and community leaders have joined the effort to reduce runoff through voluntary measures and educating their peers. Farmers using sustainable practices invite colleagues to tour their farms and learn. 

    “We’ve seen a lot of good buy-in,” said Walling. “They’re going above and beyond in their conservation, and also being that mouthpiece, inviting other agricultural producers onto their farms, to share information to try to generate more comfort across the agricultural community.” 

    How to make our region a leader in agricultural practices that protect clean water

    Ultimately, farming in the Great Lakes isn’t going anywhere, so the way we farm has to change for the lakes and people to stay healthy. This issue won’t be solved by cracking down on a few bad actors, but by making the Great Lakes a leader in agriculture that actually protects clean water. 

    As Walling, Zimnicki and other Alliance leaders noted, concrete steps to achieving this goal include: 

    • Requiring that funding for agricultural best-management practices to reduce phosphorus is tied to reducing phosphorus entering waterways. This means farmers aren’t just paid to adopt certain practices, but instead paid for actually reducing phosphorus runoff. 
    • Instituting a robust network for water quality monitoring in Lake Erie’s Western Basin. 
    • Utilizing the Farm Bill to fully fund conservation programs and provide technical assistance for farmers.  
    • Securing stable streams of state funding for conservation and enforcement and ensuring state-level permits, particularly those for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), provide more rigorous standards for waste management – especially in already impaired watersheds.  

    These actions and more will be the focus of the Alliance’s federal and state advocacy agendas to reduce agricultural pollution over the next five years.  

    “The private agriculture sector needs to step up and demonstrate that it is able to operate without polluting our drinking water, just as other industries are required to do,” said Brammeier. “ 

    “Ultimately, companies in the agricultural supply and distribution chain need to acknowledge that clean water is a critical measure of whether they are operating sustainably. The health of the Great Lakes can’t be an afterthought.”  

      

    Give a Gift – Protect the Great Lakes

    Your gift will protect our region’s most precious resource: the fresh, clean, and natural waters of the Great Lakes.

    Donate Today

    The post Complicated Crops: Agriculture is a major economic engine in the Great Lakes, and poses the greatest threat to their waters appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2023/10/complicated-crops-agriculture-is-a-major-economic-engine-in-the-great-lakes-and-poses-the-greatest-threat-to-their-waters/

    Judy Freed

    Chicago, IL (September 28, 2023)Earlier today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S EPA) approved the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed total maximum daily load (TMDL) for the Maumee River – the main tributary feeding the Western Basin of Lake Erie. 

    The Ohio EPA’s proposed TMDL was developed in response to chronic algal blooms that occur due to excessive nutrient pollution from surrounding land use. Agriculture is a major uncontrolled contributor to these blooms. A TMDL lays out a  “pollution diet” necessary to meet water quality targets. The Ohio EPA was required to develop the TMDL per a recent consent decree. 

    In response, Tom Zimnicki, the Alliance’s Agriculture & Restoration Policy Director, issued the following statement:

    “The Western Basin of Lake Erie is a vital resource to the region. Despite millions of dollars of investment over decades, it remains plagued by chronic harmful algal blooms. A TMDL is an important tool in combating these blooms and the nutrients that feed them. However, in its decision, U.S. EPA has doubled down on the same tired, status quo approach that led Ohio to need a TMDL in the first place. 

    As it stands, the approved TMDL does not address crucial elements needed to improve Lake Erie water quality. We remain committed to protecting and restoring Lake Erie for those who depend on it, and we will continue to advocate for stronger standards and programs in Ohio to address nutrient pollution.”

    ###

    Media contact: Please connect with our media team at TeamGreatLakes@mrss.com.

    More about Lake Erie’s Algal Blooms

    Read background and recent updates about Lake Erie’s algal blooms.

    Learn More

    The post Plan to Improve Lake Erie Water Quality Lacks Elements Critical for Success appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2023/09/plan-to-improve-lake-erie-water-quality-lacks-elements-critical-for-success/

    Judy Freed

    Donald Jodrey headshot.
    Don Jodrey, Director of Federal Government Relations

    Note: This blog is part of a periodic series of updates from Don Jodrey, the Alliance’s Director of Federal Government Relations, with his view on Great Lakes policy from Washington, DC.

    At the beginning of the year, we announced an ambitious Great Lakes federal policy agenda. We also noted that it was the start of a new Congress and an era of divided government. We predicted that there were likely to be major policy disagreements between the Republican House, the Democratic Senate, and the Biden administration that might result in a stalemate or lack of progress on some issues.

    We’re now past the halfway mark of the year, and Congress is on its August recess. So we’re asking: Are Great Lakes priorities making progress? And what else can we do to advocate for the Great Lakes?

    Budget battles: Funding holds for Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, but disagreements threaten water infrastructure & environmental justice

    After several months of protracted negotiations to deal with the debt ceiling, which resulted in legislation to keep nondefense spending flat in FY 2024 and provide a small 1% increase in FY 2025, both the House and Senate Appropriations Committees have marked up the bills that contain funding for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI). The House committee provided $368 million, which is the same as last year’s enacted level, while the Senate committee provided a $5 million increase for a total of $373 million. These funding levels are well short of the program’s authorized level of $425 million. However, given the major funding reductions proposed by the House elsewhere in the bill and in the debt ceiling agreement, holding the GLRI program at the same level as last year demonstrates the strong bipartisan support for this program throughout the Great Lakes delegation.

    Unfortunately, water infrastructure programs did not fare well in the House bill markup. The House Appropriations Committee proposed steep cuts – more than $1.7 billion – to water infrastructure funding that supports state clean water and drinking water programs. House Republicans rationalized these reductions by noting that the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 provided major increases for water infrastructure for the next several years. However, the House’s proposed reduction is alarming. These cuts are not consistent with the debt ceiling agreement both parties agreed to earlier this year and backtrack on much-needed federal support for essential drinking water, sewer, and stormwater projects. 

    The House also proposes eliminating environmental justice funding for the Environmental Protection Agency and rescinding more than $1.4 billion in funding for environmental and climate justice programs provided by the Inflation Reduction Act. 

    In contrast, the Senate Appropriations Committee proposes to maintain water infrastructure and environmental justice funding consistent with last year’s level and with the Inflation Reduction Act.

    Given these major policy disagreements over federal funding, it is highly unlikely that the House and Senate will be able to come to agreement on the individual spending bills this year. The potential for a government shutdown is high and a continuing resolution is a certainty. The debt ceiling deal requires Congress to pass all 12 annual spending bills by January 1, and if they are not passed or a short-term funding extension is in place, then an automatic funding reduction of 1% will occur.

    Plastics legislation is introduced in the Senate

    The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee has held several hearings on the topic of plastic pollution this year. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) has introduced “The Plastic Pellet Free Waters Act” to begin the effort to address the problems posed by plastic pellets in our waters, including the Great Lakes. The bill would require the Environmental Protection Agency, using its Clean Water Act regulatory authorities, to prohibit the discharge of plastic pellets and other pre-production plastics into waterways from facilities and sources that make, use, package, or transport plastic pellets. Plastic pellets, like other microplastics, pose a danger to human health, as well as to fish, wildlife, and ecosystems. It is estimated that more than 250,000 tons of plastic pellets are in our waterways, and more than 42 of 66 beaches in the Great Lakes have been found to have serious pollution issues associated with plastic pellets. Although a companion House bill has not yet been introduced and other plastic pollution reduction measures are likely to be introduced in the Senate in the coming months, this is likely to be an area that Congress will debate for some time. 

    On the Administrative side, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently released for public comment its draft national strategy to address plastic pollution. We at the Alliance, along with some of our partners, strongly advocated that EPA utilize its existing authorities under the Clean Water Act to regulate and reduce microplastic pollution in our water.

    Stay tuned for the Farm Bill

    Both the House and Senate Agriculture Committees have held hearings and significant outreach on the 2023 Farm Bill and have introduced “marker bills” (bills that will not be passed but that are placeholders) for this must-pass piece of legislation. It is likely that legislative text will emerge in September. But the disagreements in funding between the House and the Senate for some Farm Bill programs indicate that this traditionally bipartisan piece of legislation may face some tough challenges this year. We have encouraged Great Lakes members to support increased funding for conservation programs, as well as provisions to ensure accountability for conservation programs that address agricultural runoff pollution.

    Engineering and design continues for invasive carp protections

    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is continuing its pre-construction, engineering, and design work for invasive carp protections at Brandon Road Lock and Dam in Illinois. This important project is intended to stop the spread of invasive carp into the Great Lakes. The project received much-needed funding boosts from the States of Illinois and Michigan, which included funds in their state budgets to cover the state share of the construction costs for the project. The next step is for the State of Illinois and the Corps to sign a project partnership agreement so that the first phase of construction may commence in mid-2024.

    Looking ahead, your voice matters

    The legislative process will continue for the rest of the year – and, as noted earlier, there are major disagreements between the House and Senate over funding. Your voice can make a difference. Contact Congress about the issues that are of concern to you, particularly in areas where major reductions to clean and safe drinking water programs are proposed, or if federal legislation would be helpful to address a particular need like reducing plastic pollution or addressing harmful nutrient runoff. Let your members of Congress know how important clean and healthy Great Lakes are to you.

    Protect the Great Lakes & Our Communities

    Too many Great Lakers experience polluted water – whether it is lead-tainted water coming from taps in homes or algal blooms fouling beaches. Visit our Action Center and learn how you can take action.

    Take Action

    The post DC Update: Are Great Lakes Priorities Advancing in an Era of Divided Government? appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2023/08/dc-update-are-great-lakes-priorities-advancing-in-an-era-of-divided-government/

    Judy Freed

    For our Diving Deep for Solutions series, we commissioned author and journalist Kari Lydersen to examine big issues facing the lakes today and how our expert team at the Alliance for the Great Lakes is growing to meet the moment.


    “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure,” notes Alliance for the Great Lakes Vice President for Policy Molly Flanagan.   

    The old adage is often cited in regards to invasive species, and a good example is the $1 billion-plus of federal and state dollars proposed to keep invasive carp from advancing into Lake Michigan – “even if it costs a lot,” Flanagan continued. 

    “You’re talking about fishing industries worth $7 billion a year, recreational boating worth $16 billion a year, and you’re protecting a lot of different economies that equal much more than that,” Flanagan continued. 

    Years of advocacy advance efforts to block invasive carp

    Thanks to years of advocacy by the Alliance and our partners, the federal government has upped the portion it is willing to pay for constructing barriers to block the voracious invasive carp, at Brandon Road Lock and Dam on the Des Plaines River southwest of Chicago.   

    Design of the Brandon Road Interbasin Project as of May 31, 2023. Credit: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

    Last year through the Water Resources Development Act, the federal government agreed to pick up 90% of a tab estimated at $1.5 billion, if states will pay the rest. Previously, the federal government had planned to pay 65%. 

    The new plan means Great Lakes states must pay about $115 million total. This year Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer proposed $64 million in the state budget, and Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker proposed $50 million. Both budgets passed state legislatures.  

    To move the deal forward, the state of Illinois still needs to sign an agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 

    “We’ve been putting forth a simple message: Illinois needs to sign the agreement,” said Flanagan. “Any delay risks delaying the project. We can’t afford that because we’re in a race against the clock to keep invasive carp out of the Great Lakes.” 

    Advocates race against the clock to defend fishing , recreational boating

    Invasive carp jump into the air. Photo by U.S. Geological Survey.

    The planned barrier includes a bubble curtain, electric barrier, acoustic deterrents and a flushing lock. Pre-construction work is underway thanks to close to $10 million already committed by Illinois and Michigan. 

    “It’s a really positive development in terms of Michigan and Illinois working together,” Flanagan said. “All the states are coming to the table to talk about the carp issue and try to problem-solve. They haven’t all committed money, but it’s another good example of how our region collaborates.”

    Ironically, the crystal-clear water that many appreciate in Lake Michigan is the result of previous invaders that colonized the lakes – zebra mussels and quagga mussels. 

    “They’re filtering out the bottom of the food web, with dramatic impacts,” said Flanagan. “The water is so clear but that’s not necessarily a good thing – there’s [almost] nothing left in the water for other fish to eat. If invasive carp get in, they’ll also feed on the base of the food web.” That would be especially damaging to plankton-rich places like western Lake Erie and Green Bay. 

    And that’s not to mention another likely impact of one of several threatening species of invasive carp – the “flying” silver carp, as Flanagan said, known for jumping violently out of the water when agitated by boat engines. 

    This behavior makes infested rivers too risky for boaters. “That would hammer the recreational economy in the region. Who wants to boat on the Chicago or Kalamazoo River if carps are flying at you?” 

    Ballast water regulations are crucial for both “lakers” and ocean ships

    An ocean ship enters the Great Lakes from the St. Lawrence Seaway.

    While invasive carp are advancing from the Mississippi River, where they’ve devastated the ecosystem and recreation, more invasives have historically come via ships plying the St. Lawrence Seaway. 

    Ocean ships take in ballast in freshwater and brackish ports around the globe, including live organisms, and empty it when they’ve reached destinations and need to take on cargo in the Great Lakes. For years advocates from around the country, including the Alliance, have demanded stricter regulations on ballast water. While ocean ships now have to install treatment technology, unfortunately, EPA’s latest draft rules missed the mark.  

    “Ship-borne invasive species cost the Great Lakes Region alone at least $200 million dollars every year,” says a 2020 comment on the proposed EPA rules by the Alliance and other organizations. “This is a dire problem that must be solved.” 

    But “lakers” – ships that stay within the Great Lakes – are exempt from the draft rules, even though they also transport ballast and organisms in it between the lakes as they carry ore, salt and other commodities. Hence the EPA should include lakers in its ballast water rule just as Canada has, and finalize the rule, the Alliance says. 

    “We need to keep pressure on the EPA to regulate lakers,” Flanagan said. “This is critical to protecting the Great Lakes from invasive species.” 

    Meanwhile the rules are not as strict as advocates have demanded, since they don’t require best available treatment technology for ballast, like advanced ultraviolet radiation systems, and they don’t prohibit ships taking on ballast in areas that are polluted by algae or sewage. 

    Winning new protections while acknowledging a legacy of damage

    Quagga mussels

    Alliance President & CEO Joel Brammeier called the battle against invasives a “mature” struggle –  one where the Alliance and other advocates are winning substantial new protections but where the Great Lakes have suffered permanent damage that can never be reversed.  

    Few invasive species have been introduced in recent years, thanks to prevention protocols and spending urged by the Alliance and other players. But continued vigilance is needed to deal with the nearly 200 harmful invasive species already in the Great Lakes, and the threat of new ones like invasive carp.   

    “We need to continually invest in prevention and control and never let that slide,” Brammeier said. “Our lakes have suffered enough, and I believe people across the region understand the importance of not going backward.” 

    Meanwhile the debate on ballast speaks to larger changes in economic priorities for the Great Lakes. Great Lakes shipping is still a booming industry credited for generating $35 billion in economic activity a year, while Great Lakes residents, cities and states are increasingly prioritizing the recreational and ecological value of the lakes. 

    “Our region missed the boat by letting invasive species in the lakes in the first place. That’s a tough lesson,” Brammeier said. “But it compels us to ask tough questions about every industry that wants to use the lakes. And everyone is going to have to demonstrate it can do so sustainably, because Great Lakers understand the risks better than most.”   

    Give a Gift – Protect the Great Lakes

    Your gift will protect our region’s most precious resource: the fresh, clean, and natural waters of the Great Lakes.

    Donate Today

    The post An Ounce of Prevention: Keeping New Invasive Species Out of the Great Lakes appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2023/08/an-ounce-of-prevention-keeping-new-invasive-species-out-of-the-great-lakes/

    Judy Freed

    Chicago, IL (June 30, 2023) – This week the Michigan legislature approved $64 million in the appropriations bill for fiscal year 2024 to help fund construction of the Brandon Road project designed to keep invasive carp from reaching the Great Lakes. When combined with the $50 million approved by Illinois, these funds cover the $114 million required for the local cost share. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers also has $226 million available, which is enough federal funding to complete preconstruction, engineering and design and pay the federal share for the first year of construction. However, the state of Illinois still needs to sign a Project Partnership Agreement with the Corps to unlock these federal funds and keep the project moving.

    Established populations of invasive carp are only 50 miles from Chicago and Lake Michigan, and earlier this month a bighead carp weighing 109 pounds was caught during the Upper Illinois Waterway’s Invasive Carp control program near Morris, Ill. That was after a 90-pound fish was caught just a day before.

    The Alliance for the Great Lakes COO and Vice President for Programs Molly Flanagan said:

    “Invasive carp pose a serious threat to the ecological health of the Great Lakes and the people and economies these waters support, including the region’s $7 billion fishing and $16 billion recreational boating industries.

    We are pleased that Michigan and Illinois have joined together to fund the local share of the Brandon Road project designed to keep Invasive carp from reaching the Great Lakes. All the local funding is now in place to pay for the construction of the project. We urge the state of Illinois to sign the Project Partnership Agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as soon as possible so that this critical work can continue uninterrupted.”

    ###

    Media contact: Please connect with our media team at TeamGreatLakes@mrss.com.

    More About Invasive Carp

    Check out our recent updates on the fight against invasive carp.

    Learn More

    The post Michigan & Illinois Funding Is Welcome Step toward Construction of Invasive Carp Barrier appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2023/06/michigan-illinois-funding-is-welcome-step-toward-construction-of-invasive-carp-barrier/

    Judy Freed

    Chicago, IL (June 29, 2023) – Earlier today, NOAA and its research partners released the annual western Lake Erie harmful algal bloom forecast. In response, Alliance for the Great Lakes Agriculture and Restoration Policy Director Tom Zimnicki made the following statement:

    “Regardless of this particular forecast’s results, it is abundantly clear that the region will not meet the 2025 phosphorus reduction targets the Ohio and Michigan state governments set for the Western Basin of Lake Erie. Our lack of overall progress, particularly on reigning in agricultural nutrient losses, means the basin will continue to experience algal blooms, tourism will suffer, and municipal ratepayers will continue to foot the bill for any meaningful phosphorus reductions entering the basin. Despite hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, both Michigan and Ohio — the states with the lion’s share of the basin’s drainage area — remain woefully behind in regard to the necessary financial investment and acres of conservation practices in the watershed. It is imperative that the states outline a new, more rigorous strategy to address nutrient loading in the basin that goes beyond the status quo approach.”

    More About Lake Erie

    Check out our latest reports, stories and podcasts about Lake Erie’s harmful algal blooms.

    Learn More

    The post Region not on track to meet phosphorus reductions needed to limit western Lake Erie’s harmful algal blooms appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2023/06/region-not-on-track-to-meet-phosphorus-reductions-needed-to-limit-western-lake-eries-harmful-algal-blooms/

    Judy Freed

    Cities across the country are investing in their stormwater infrastructure with hopes of achieving triple bottom line benefits – for people, the environment, and economic return. In the face of a changing climate that brings more extreme wet weather, a combination of gray infrastructure (pipes and tunnels) and green stormwater infrastructure (plants and soil) is a recipe for resilience that many cities are trying to perfect.

    But responsibility for green stormwater infrastructure is rarely the primary mandate of any one department or agency. Instead, multiple agencies manage green infrastructure – from transportation to parks, stormwater to planning. And when agencies don’t collaborate, inefficiencies, inequities, and working at cross purposes often result.

    Shared service arrangements can help. These legal agreements help agencies save money, pool resources, and collaborate to solve systemic water problems while still achieving their individual mandates.

    Models of Shared Service Arrangements in Stormwater Governance takes a high-level look at 7 types of agreements, from simple informal agreements to Joint Benefits Authority. Each type of agreement is described with an easy-to-read overview of how it operates, when it’s suitable, advantages & disadvantages, and an example. 

    Read more to learn what type of agreement could be the best fit for your agency and its partners.

    The post Models of Shared Service Arrangements in Stormwater Governance appeared first on Alliance for the Great Lakes.

    Original Article

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    News - Alliance for the Great Lakes

    https://greatlakes.org/2023/06/models-of-shared-service-arrangements-in-stormwater-governance/

    Judy Freed