What the Spirit Lake Great Lakes Legacy Act cleanup site looked in the winter of 2021-22. Image credit: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

On Feb. 9, River Talks featured Mark Loomis, project manager for the Legacy Act Project at Spirit Lake on the St. Louis River in Duluth. Loomis presented an update, providing images and information on the remediation project’s status.

The Great Lakes Legacy Act (GLLA) is a voluntary program between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Steel. Contractors from both organizations work to reduce the effects of contaminated sediments in Great Lakes Areas of Concern. These contaminants are large contributors to environmental degradation in the Great Lakes.

How does this work? Loomis shed some light on the process in the Spirit Lake project area. First comes removal. Mechanical excavation or hydraulic dredging removes the unwanted material, and then residual covers are placed over the sites. “That material is put into two on-site disposal facilities. Each of those facilities has a different method,” said Loomis, “Another mechanism that we’re using for remediation is called capping.” Capping is the act of placing protective layers of sand and carbon to stop contaminants from rising up through the water.

Other mechanisms include Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery, which helps to speed up recovery, Monitored Natural Recovery, which simply observes recovery, and finally, habitat restoration. With this process, the integrity of Spirit Lake improves and habitat space for aquatic species increases.

Hydraulic dredging is a large focus of the Spirit Lake Project. “Hydraulic dredging in its simplest form is a cutter head that spins and eats up the sediment. It gets sucked through a series of pipes and pumps and is brought to a Geotube bag-field,” said Loomis. Dredging activities are currently taking place in the Wire Mill Delta. After the dredging is completed, the next step is to place a residual cover. “The residual cover water treatment plant takes clean material that is on the land, and we pump it through pipes in slurry. It’s then broadcast out to the spreader treatment plant.”

Despite working in his field for over a decade, Loomis still thought that seeing Geotubes get filled was “neat.” The pipe from the dredges goes through a series of treatment plants that prepare the contents for the Geotubes. These Geotubes run across the entirety of the upland confined disposal facility. Sediment remains inside of the Geotubes while the water runs out back into the lake.

With more and more Geotubes filling up and dewatering, the project staff plan to layer more on top. When the field is complete, it should stand about four Geotubes high.

The Legacy Act also focuses on upland habitat restoration. Loomis highlighted a specific upstream portion of land near Spirit Lake where native plants were planted last year. “We were in a constant mental and physical battle with geese and deer who saw this as a delicious buffet,” Loomis said. Despite the feud with wildlife, Loomis reported that the process is going well.

Loomis gives a more comprehensive list of past progress to date during his presentation, which is available online. To watch a video of this presentation, visit the Lake Superior Estuarine Research Reserve’s YouTube site.

For more information on the series, visit the River Talks page: go.wisc.edu/4uz720.

 

The post An update on the Spirit Lake Great Lakes Legacy Act Project with Mark Loomis first appeared on Wisconsin Sea Grant.

Original Article

Blog | Wisconsin Sea Grant

Blog | Wisconsin Sea Grant

https://www.seagrant.wisc.edu/blog/an-update-on-the-spirit-lake-great-lakes-legacy-act-project-with-mark-loomis/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=an-update-on-the-spirit-lake-great-lakes-legacy-act-project-with-mark-loomis

Eva Ryan

By Eva Ryan, University of Wisconsin-Madison

In 2022, Wisconsin Sea Grant will celebrate its 50th anniversary, marking five decades of work geared toward protecting ecosystems, addressing natural and economic disasters, supporting aquaculture industries, educating the public on related topics, and much more. Wisconsin Sea Grant has been a beacon of accurate, scientific information, and will continue to be so in the future.

To kick off the celebration, I interviewed Tim Campbell, aquatic invasive species (AIS) outreach specialist, to see how things have changed in his field in the past 50 years, and how he hopes they will progress. His story is first in an anniversary series we plan to continue on our blog.

Visitors learn about aquatic invasive species at an information stand hosted by Tim Campbell, Wisconsin Sea Grant (right) and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources during the Ghost Ships Festival, Milwaukee, 2013. Image credit: Wisconsin Sea Grant

Campbell recounted a brief history of the study of invasive species: The creation of the Welland Canal, a human-made waterway that links Lake Ontario to Lake Erie in the mid-1800s sparked the idea of invasive species in the Great Lakes. Sea lampreys and alewives were able to travel through the Welland Canal into the Great Lakes, majorly impacting both people and fish.

While Great Lakes invasion science used to be primarily focused on managing sea lamprey and alewives for the benefit of commercial and recreational fisheries, Campbell noted that “now, what we think about in terms of invasive species in the Great Lakes and the Great Lakes region is so much more broad than just alewives and sea lamprey.” New invasive species like zebra and quagga mussels have expanded what requires management. Another task trying to be proactive in keeping other nonnative species from being introduced. Improvements in control programs give AIS managers alternatives and new prevention programs have helped reach wider audiences.

And while advancement in science and technology have bolstered our understanding of invasive species and the pathways they use to breach new areas, new pathways are continuously arising. Campbell cited online marketplaces as an example. These marketplaces, which allow customers to purchase species from anywhere in the world, have complicated AIS management in the past 10 years. Additionally, new segments of existing pathways – like recreational watercraft with ballast tanks – keep AIS managers readdressing pathways they thought were already sufficiently covered by their management plans.

“I think we’re starting to get more specific with pathways and how we can focus less on the actual invasive species and more on the people using the pathways – how we can work with them to stop unintentionally moving plants and animals around,” Campbell said. He went on to mention that “as we have gotten a better handle on some pathways, new ones are also emerging. We need to be aware of how these pathways function, how these species and goods are moving around, and how we can make sure that only things that we want are being introduced into the environment.”

So where does invasion science go from here? Through the eyes of Campbell, the “limiting factor” of his field is often not new biological facts about invasive species, but rather “getting people to understand the impacts of their actions and getting them to take action.” In terms of progressing the field of invasion science, Campbell has high hopes that the approach of shifting toward social science and trying to incorporate more of it into invasive species management will bode well.

“In the next 50 years, I hope we keep going down this track of interdisciplinary work and trying to use all of the different scientific disciplines to address our problems” in order to, “leave no stone unturned for potential improvements,” Campbell said.

When asked for final comments, Campbell left me with this: “It [the Sea and Land Grant College approach] has historically been very important in managing our agricultural problems and natural resource issues, and I think we will be even more important in the future because of where we sit between science and communities. Especially in this age of finding anything on the internet, no matter the accuracy, I think that it’s important to have this trusted source of scientific information to help communities make the best decisions possible.”

The post Invasive Species: Then and Now first appeared on Wisconsin Sea Grant.

Original Article

Blog | Wisconsin Sea Grant

Blog | Wisconsin Sea Grant

https://www.seagrant.wisc.edu/blog/invasive-species-then-and-now/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=invasive-species-then-and-now

Marie Zhuikov